Jump to content

Talk:British Helsinki Human Rights Group

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

[Untitled]

[edit]

For those interested in following the latest activities of the BHHRG I would draw attention to the 'London International Democracy Institute' which conducted 'election monitoring' during the recent parliamentary elections in Kyrgyzstan (February 2005). Not unsurprisingly the LIDI posted positive findings for the first round of elections - lining up alongside the CIS observers. See "Analysis: Kyrgyz, Tajik Elections Present Familar Issues, New Context", Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty, 02 March 2005). The LIDI was fronted by Alexander Tsinkler, last seen in Ukraine as Head of the Observer Mission from 'the Instiute for East European and CIS Nations'. I would be interested to learn whether there is any evidence of a link between the reports that the Kremlin is active to create 'NGOs' for election monitoring purposes and the activities of organisations such as the ones mentioned above.

Someone wrote: it has campaigned against immigration to the United Kingdom.it has campaigned against immigration to the United Kingdom.

This is credible (from all i've read so far), but it would be good to have some online evidence. Could whoever wrote this please add some external links? thanks. Boud 13:03, 28 Nov 2004 (UTC)

I couldn't source it, so I removed that particular claim. I think it came from a claim that someone else made about BHHRG, rather than a statement by BHHRG itself. -- ChrisO 15:33, 28 Nov 2004 (UTC)

Right now the article reads like a website review. I'm sure it's nice to know that this or that information is missing from the website, but it seems improper to attach so much weight to these omissions when they might just as well be the result of an absent-minded website editor. 84.239.128.9 11:54, 12 Dec 2004 (UTC)

The point is not simply that the information is missing but that it's part of a pattern - the BHHRG does seem to be a very secretive bunch. -- ChrisO 12:35, 12 Dec 2004 (UTC)

ChrisO - whoever he is - is a secretive bunch all to himself. Now start running to the NSA, my boy. They'll tell you who is behind my ISP.

Why not simply read their webpage? No secrets there.

The Exile has referenced this article in their latest (Dec 24, 2004) issue. The article is titled Russia’s Fifth Column; one in a series about the disputed election in Ukraine. There is further criticism of the activities of the BHHRG, but since it quotes the Wiki as a primary source, I've only linked to it here, to avoid self-referentiality. —Clarknova 18:32, 28 Dec 2004 (UTC)

The Exile is run by a certain Edward Limonov, chairman of the National Bolshevik Party in Russia. Not the sort of politician which would be accepted in democratic societies, surely. The BHHRG is often attacked by Stalinists, anti-Semites, and Neo-Nazis. Tells you all you need to know.

Who is "ChrisO". Who are you?

And who are you, anonymous editor? Why not get yourself a user account?
The reason I've been removing some of your contributions is because they don't fully comply with Wikipedia's neutral point of view (NPOV) policy. We have to present a dispassionate view of both sides of the argument, not lend our support to one side or the other. Hence "Proponents of the BHHRG suggest that this demonstrates that the group is entirely independent of governments" is neutral while "Of course, it can easily be argued that this demonstrates that the group is entirely independent of governments." isn't - that's a commentary, not a description of someone's position. I'm sure you'd find it useful to have a look at the NPOV policy before you make more edits to the BHHRG article. -- ChrisO 21:23, 4 Jan 2005 (UTC)


And I think you find it useful to reread your own entries. You claim things that are very tendentious, but somehow they are "neutral". You say I am a "proponent". Will you describe yourself as an "opponent"? If not, why not? Does it mean I can edit all you say by adding "Opponents of the BHHRG" say.....

Yes? Or no?

You were the one starting this entry. You identify yourself first. If you do, I will follow. Word of honour.


The fact that it's based out of Norman Stone's house surely is relevant, given that it's run by his wife - Stone may not be a trustee of the BHHRG but he's certainly part of the Oxford Conservative group, as I know from personal experience, having had some dealings with him when I was at the University in the 1990s. He's also definitely associated with the BHHRG, having done work on its behalf in Slovakia [1].

Is guilty by association your modus operandi? Stone is not a part of BHHRG whatsoever. There is no "Oxford Conservative Group". Your personal experience with the members of the BHHRG is interesting. It raises the suspicion that you might write out of other motives than simply providing information. The reader should know where you stand.

As for changes to the article, please feel free to suggest some, but bear in mind the NPOV requirements and the relevance of your contributions. Saying whether the BHHRG is right or wrong about things is both partisan and beyond the scope of the article. We can legitimately report what other groups and people say about it, and what it says about them. And please don't post personal comments to the article - that constitutes vandalism and could result in you being blocked from editing. -- ChrisO 22:24, 4 Jan 2005 (UTC)

You may have noticed that I do not edit out any of your links, not even your list of controversial aspects, although that list is suggestive and does not provide a balanced picture of the BHHRG. Your original article was terribly biased. Only since I have been editing has certain counter-balancing and relevant information been added.

--- Whoever wrote this article about the BHHRG clearly has a political agenda. It is not objective information; it is an attack piece and as such explicitly violates the Wikipedia's stated terms of service policy. I am notifying those responsible for Wiki of this violation. ---

On Norman Stone

[edit]

The location of the BHHRG's "office" (probably Norman Stone's study) is mentioned in Jeremy Druker's report: "The group is run out of Stone's three-story, red-brick Victorian house in Oxford. There is no identifying plaque for the BHHRG outside the house." [2] Given that this is both factual and relevant, I suggest that this article's anonymous editor should refrain from deleting it. -- ChrisO 23:09, 6 Jan 2005 (UTC)

Unfortunately, it is not factual. The organisation is not run from the study of Norman Stone. I cannot for the life of me see what is relevant about it with regard to the BHHRG of which Norman Stone is not a member.

Two more relevant points: the article you quote is 6 years old. The article does not mention Norman Stone. From the article one cannot read the information you dissiminate in this entry, which seems to be entirely based on your personal knowledge.

The BHHRG is a very small organisation in which most if not all of the key members have personal, professional or political ties with each other - if I was going to be partisan about it I could describe it as a small coterie of like-minded right-wing academics. Let's join the dots:
  • The organisation is run out of Norman & Christine Stone's home.
  • Norman Stone himself has worked for the BHHRG on its observer missions.
  • His wife Christine co-founded it.
  • His colleague Mark Almond (a fellow member of the Oxford history faculty until 1996) is another co-founder.
  • The third co-founder, John Laughland, is a former lecturer at the Sorbonne, which is presumably where he crossed paths with Almond and/or the Stones.
  • All four share a common (right-wing libertarian) political outlook and an interest in central and eastern Europe.
  • Norman Stone isn't in the limelight quite as much as the BHHRG's trustees but he's certainly involved. NOPE. The definition of who counts a "member" is in any case very vague, as it doesn't publish a list of members, but Stone has certainly worked for the BHHRG. By that definition at least, he is a member. -- ChrisO 01:04, 7 Jan 2005 (UTC)

You treat this whole thing as some Shelock Holmes excercise. Although the article is now a bit more "neutral", as the wiki rules require, it is still pretty biased, with the dominant tone of your work being one of "exposing a secretive bunch". When I first read it I had the distinct impression you were on some personal vendetta. That stinks.

The fact that Norman Stone may have participated once or twice in BHHRG activities is of little relevance. By that logic, I'd be a member of the Conservative Party for life if I took part in one of their conferences on "Privatisation and the Happiness of Mankind" or some such subject in 1993.

By the way, who is "ChrisO"? And where do you live?

This is not a historical reference but a hatchet job. Who knows why the authors see themselves as the guardians of truth in contemporary political analysis, but there can hardly be any question that they do. I personally disagree with their take on the world which is only one of many, and find it disturbing that they will tolerate no dissent from their 'party line'. No one serious could ever rely on an entry framed in this manner. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 194.60.38.10 (talk • contribs) 15:27, 10 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Just a reader passing by... I have learned an awful lot from reading the material on bhhrgs website and feel sorry for this article, sad. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 77.53.48.108 (talk) 02:12, 16 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

International Helsinki Federation

[edit]

@ChrisO: are you going to suppress the factual information that the International Helsinki Federation has gone under in a financial scandal, as determined by Austrian courts and reported by the International Herald Tribune? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.87.210.154 (talk) 16:01, 4 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

It shouldn't be suppressed, but this article isn't the place for it. It belongs at International Helsinki Federation. Cordless Larry (talk) 19:23, 4 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Exactly right. It's not germane to this article. -- ChrisO (talk) 19:48, 4 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

ChrisO, I knew you would suppress it, you little bolshevik you. Why is this FACTUAL, COURT-BASED, INTERNATIONALLY REPORTED information not 'germane' to this article? And why has the IHF in the introduction been replaced by the non-existing "Helsinki Committee for Human Rights"? How can anyone affiliate to oneself, for the BHHRG is a "Helsinki Committe for Human Rights"? The fact of the matter is that the IHF has accused the BHHRG of many things over the years and now is shown to have been a terribly incompetent organisation to say the least. You think you can accuse someone in court for being not reliable and then silence the defence when he brings up the fact that you yourself are not trustworthy? I think you should be taken of this case ChrisO because you have been nothing but biased and dishonest in your dealings with this entry. As such, you withhold relevant information to the neutral reader and try to influence opinion by selective editing. If this entry is anything to go by Wikipedia is by no means the neutral information provider it presents itself to be. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.87.210.154 (talk) 21:55, 5 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

He isn't claiming that the information isn't important, just that this isn't the place for it. This article is about the British Helsinki Human Rights Group. The International Helsinki Federation article is about the International Helsinki Federation. Information about the problems of the International Helsinki Federation belongs in the International Helsinki Federation article. To use another example, if this article was about France, we would note that it neighbours Germany, and link to the Germany article, but we wouldn't include a section on German history. Cordless Larry (talk) 23:11, 5 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Still operational?

[edit]

I note that the BHHRG website hasn't been working for some time now. Does anyone know if the group is still operating? Cordless Larry (talk) 14:08, 8 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on British Helsinki Human Rights Group. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers. —cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 09:05, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 4 external links on British Helsinki Human Rights Group. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 15:56, 6 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 4 external links on British Helsinki Human Rights Group. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 07:46, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 8 external links on British Helsinki Human Rights Group. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 10:57, 28 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 7 external links on British Helsinki Human Rights Group. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:04, 26 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on British Helsinki Human Rights Group. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:29, 29 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:British_Helsinki_Human_Rights_Group&oldid=1205967017"