Talk:Nasdaq

	; Archives (Index) ;
	1;
	This page is archived by ClueBot III.

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Nasdaq article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: Index, 1: 90 days

Business High‑importance

	Business portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Business, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of business articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BusinessWikipedia:WikiProject BusinessTemplate:WikiProject BusinessWikiProject Business articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Finance & Investment Top‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Finance & Investment, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Finance and Investment on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Finance & InvestmentWikipedia:WikiProject Finance & InvestmentTemplate:WikiProject Finance & InvestmentFinance & Investment articles
Top	This article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale.

New York City Low‑importance

	New York City portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject New York City, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of New York City-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.New York CityWikipedia:WikiProject New York CityTemplate:WikiProject New York CityNew York City articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

A fact from this article was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the On this day section on February 8, 2005, February 8, 2006, February 8, 2007, February 8, 2008, and February 8, 2018.

Please check the CMT Codeamaster8.com is it trustworthy? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2405:201:5502:D0F0:B5E4:FC99:E8FB:BA44 (talk) 10:31, 6 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 27 January 2021

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: Moved (non-admin closure) (t · c) buidhe 05:31, 3 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

NASDAQ → Nasdaq – Formalizing the above move request, the all-caps styling has not been the proper name of this stock exchange in many years. It is not only no longer styled as such by the exchange themselves in either text or their logo, but also by third-party coverage from such reliable sources as The New York Times and The Wall Street Journal, who might know a thing or two about the stock markets. oknazevad (talk) 05:08, 27 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Support per nom.--Ortizesp (talk) 05:25, 27 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support per nom. Should NASDAQ Composite also be moved to Nasdaq Composite? LSGH (talk) (contributions) 07:00, 27 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment I think so. None of the sources I've seen spell it as all caps anymore, just like the exchange itself. oknazevad (talk) 20:08, 27 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support as noted it isn't even styled with caps, clearly caps are inappropriate. Crouch, Swale (talk) 19:26, 27 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Rreagan007 (talk) 20:58, 27 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support move per nom and above. O.N.R. ^(talk) 21:25, 27 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Nasdaq website. Sideriver84 (talk) 04:53, 1 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

creation date

The Internet wasn't created till 1983, so I don't think the NASDAQ was really created in 71, as a global trading system. Perhaps there were 5 or 6 guys with file on companies on their computers, but they had to punch cards to talk to the thing, so.... come on now, let's get it right. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2603:6010:4404:D1D4:5DCB:8741:C016:882C (talk) 14:17, 3 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You do realize that computer networking long predates the global internet, right? oknazevad (talk) 15:12, 3 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

"Founded" vs "inception"?

Wikidata says that NASDAQ had its conception on the 4th of February 1971, while the article says it was found on the 8th of February. Which is correct? toreau (talk) 20:11, 7 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Should all the "NASDAQ" acronyms be changed to "Nasdaq" to conform with their name change SEC filing from 2017

Link to source:

https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro/nasdaq/2017/34-81917.pdf ScratchyGamer314 (talk) 13:42, 2 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Only for ones after the change. The ones from before were still properly all caps reflecting the name's original creation as an acronym. That they later went to mixed case can and should be mentioned, and references after that should be in said mixed case, but it would be anachronistic to use it before the official change. oknazevad (talk) 13:51, 2 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]