Talk:Hosiery
 | This  level-5 vital article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
Needed?
[edit]I don't see that hosiery is necessarily an undergarment. It is so only to the extent that it is not normally visible when worn. Legwear, to the extent that it is ordinarily worn in full view would not be underwear.
Sexual attitude.
[edit]This whole Hosiery series is so ridiculous in it's concept. It should be re-titled woman's hosiery since it deals with the subject as if male hosiery doesn't exist. Can the author please redo his articles and either make it clear that they are written with respect to female attire or include male aspects of the subject. It would also be sensible if the obvious "American" basis of a lot of the content could be made more international in it's outlook (Catholic school girls is one example of this). rturus (talk) 17:00, 5 December 2007 (UTC)
Androgyny?
[edit]Is that second photo simply labelled 'stockings' a man? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Casdious (talk • contribs) 17:45, 9 January 2008 (UTC)
I think both those leg pics belong to guys . . . I think anyway. This article is a bit weird anyway, but if you're going to post pics of pantyhose, a woman should probably be wearing them. --Lindsay (talk) 03:05, 19 October 2008 (UTC)
Odd redirect
[edit]Why on earth does "legwear" redirect here? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.175.37.34 (talk) 19:28, 16 December 2008 (UTC)
How Bout Medical Support Hosiery?
[edit]I came here looking for information about Medical Support Hosiery. Anti-embolism stockings, Compression hose, For both men and women. But what I find is Extra weak sauce on a weak burrito. And the discussion for this page is also weak. I need to write an article for work and if anyone ever writes this article, they may reference it if they give us a link and attribution. 70.89.245.137 (talk) 22:34, 18 March 2009 (UTC)