Talk:Prince George, Duke of Cambridge

Biography: Military / Peerage and Baronetage / Royalty and Nobility

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the military biography work group (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by WikiProject Peerage and Baronetage (assessed as Mid-importance).
	This article is supported by WikiProject Royalty and Nobility (assessed as Mid-importance).

British Royalty Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject British Royalty (a child project of the Royalty and Nobility Work Group), an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to British Royalty on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you should visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.British RoyaltyWikipedia:WikiProject British RoyaltyTemplate:WikiProject British RoyaltyBritish royalty articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Military history: Biography / British / European

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Military biography task force
	British military history task force
	European military history task force

London Low‑importance

	London portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject London, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of London on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LondonWikipedia:WikiProject LondonTemplate:WikiProject LondonLondon-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Royal peers and ordinals

Royals usually don't use ordinals, so this page probably should be at Prince George, Duke of Cambridge, just like Prince Richard, Duke of Gloucester, Prince Edward, Duke of Kent, and so on. -- Lord Emsworth 02:52, Jan 9, 2004 (UTC)

I realize that royal peers do not use ordinals. I have no objection to changing the title the title of the page from Prince Adolphus, 1st Duke of Cambridge and Prince George, 2nd Duke of Cambridge to Prince Adolphus, Duke of Cambridge and Prince George, Duke of Cambridge, respectively, for the sake of consistency. Jeff 04:02, Jan 9, 2004 (UTC)

War Office Act 1870

The War Office Act was passed in parliament and given royal assent in 1870, not 1881 as previously listed, according to both "The Mid-Victorian Generation, 1846-1886" (p.602) and "The Historical Dictionary of the British Empire" (p.249).

This has been corrected in the article. Dormskirk (talk) 20:38, 3 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Line of succession

Am I right in thinking that he was the next in line of succession to Queen Victoria, until she produced a male heir? If so, worth adding. Or would Cumberland/Hanover have resumed holding the two thrones? Johnbod (talk) 17:04, 27 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Candidate for hand of Alexandrina Victoria

I vaguely remember seeing ages ago a contemporary cartoon on the rival claims of Prince Albert of Saxe-Coburg and the then Prince George of Cambridge to the hand of Queen Victoria, and I recently watched The Young Victoria in which the scheme was mentioned. Might anyone have a source for this? Opera hat (talk) 21:47, 11 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

One source of information, which has been my citation for details inserted under the heading Marriage and Mistress, is Roger Fulford's book, "Royal Dukes, The Father and Uncles of Queen Victoria", originally published 1933 but revised 1973 by same author. William IV and Queen Adelaide are stated to have had George brought up at Windsor with an aim to potentially marrying him to Victoria, and George's own parents to have favoured this, but they clearly reckoned without Leopold I (a Saxe-Coburg, widower of Princess Charlotte and brother of Victoria's mother) who fulfilled an ambition to get her betrothed to Albert, his male line nephew, after the King's death. The book quotes from a letter Victoria subsequently wrote Albert that suggests she knew of George's father's interest by declaring she disbelieved his denial of it to Lord Melbourne.Cloptonson (talk) 10:50, 5 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

His candidacy may not have been as strong and as public as that of Prince Alexander of the Netherlands (1818-1848), who has been mentioned for context, his suit openly approved by William. Fulford does not mention this. (Though it is mentioned by later writers such as Elizabeth Longford ("Victoria R.I." published 1964).Cloptonson (talk) 11:55, 5 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Marriage

I've removed this:
"As the marriage did not exist in British law"
from the "Marriage and mistresses" section, as I'm pretty sure it's untrue. The marriage was contrary to the Royal Marriages Act, which had the effects descibed, but they were still married (and consequently the children of the marriage (just Augustus, in this case) would be legitimate). Swanny18 (talk) 23:36, 3 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Arms

Do we know of his armorial bearings? As a grandson of George III he presumably would have born the royal arms differenced by a label of five points argent, with some other symbols, but there is no reference in this entry. Robin S. Taylor (talk) 12:02, 13 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The first Duke of Cambridge had a label of three points argent, the centre point charged with a St George's cross and each of the other two with two hearts in pale gules. The warrant to the second Duke assigned him the same label with the addition of a second label, plain, of three points gules, to be borne below the former label. Fox-Davies' Guide to Heraldry, 1909, p. 498. Opera hat (talk) 12:12, 16 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Prince George, Duke of Cambridge. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120716012032/http://www.tfa.net/2011/04/30/after-the-triumph-of-the-royal-wedding-now-we-need-a-stronger-monarchy/ to http://www.tfa.net/2011/04/30/after-the-triumph-of-the-royal-wedding-now-we-need-a-stronger-monarchy/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:28, 9 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Attitude toward reform

Prince George is represented in one part of the article as opposed to all reform, yet in another section he is described as having initiated several reforms, including the adoption of improved firearms and the use of maneouvers for training. This appears to be a contradiction. Perhaps a more nuanced view of his attitude is required?Bill (talk) 02:06, 8 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

"Giorgio di Hannover" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Giorgio di Hannover has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 August 7 § Giorgio di Hannover until a consensus is reached. estar8806 (talk) ★ 17:50, 7 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]