Talk:History of Sweden (1523–1611)
This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
I suggest to move this article to Foundation of modern Sweden. Fred-Chess 10:10, August 29, 2005 (UTC)
Readability
[edit]Just for fun, I did a test on the section "Reformation" http://www.ilovejackdaniels.com/readability.php to check its readability. Here is the scores:
Flesch-Kincaid Reading Ease: 30
Ideally, web page text should be around the 60 to 80 mark on this scale. The higher the score, the more readable the text.
Flesch-Kincaid Grade Level: 16
Ideally, web page text should be around the 6 to 7 mark on this scale. The lower the score, the more readable the text.
Gunning-Fog Index: 24
Ideally, web page text should be between 11 and 15 on this scale. The lower the score, the more readable the text. (Anything over 22 should be considered the equivalent of post-graduate level text).
Fred-Chess 23:49, 26 December 2005 (UTC)
- Hmmm I get this result for all texts I try. Maybe it doesn't compute. / Fred-Chess 23:54, 26 December 2005 (UTC)
Gustav Vasas way to power
[edit]Theres a miss in the History of Sweden series. Gustav Vasas way to power isnt described in any of the articles. It should be somewhere in between Early Swedish history and Early Vasa era. The question is, in wich article should we put it? It is needed in the first to understand the final breakdown of the Kalmar Union, but its needed in the second as well to give a background to Gustavs rule. Propably there should be a more lenghty description in one of the articles, and a summary in the other. But where should we put the biggest part of the information?