User talk:Ds13

Hearing Undergraduates

I just wanted to say thank you for mentioning the hearing undergrads in [Talk:Gallaudet University]. I'm not sure how I managed to forget about the HUGS program! I even had a friend who was one of the early HUGS. (I hope actually thanking you for this here is okay; I'm new to Wikipedia so I'm not sure if this is the right place or way to express my gratitude.)

Etoile 01:43, 19 Mar 2005 (UTC)

Wikimania 2006

In the course of informal discussions at Wikimania in Frankfurt the possibility of having Wikimania 2006 in Vancouver was raised. What makes Canada desirable for such a meeting is the capacity to draw delegates from the United States. For many overseas delegates, however, U.S. visa requirements make that country less attractive. All else being equal, Europeans see Vancouver as a more interesting Canadian city to visit than Toronto, the only other Canadian city to receive significant consideration.

Preliminary bids from various cities need to be made by Sept. 30, 2005. A short list will be drawn from those bids. Is there enough interest and energy to put together such a conference in Vancouver for August 2006? The people in Frankfurt put on a tremendous gathering, with a core organizational group of about a dozen people. Some 400 people attended from 52 different countries.

I expect that a North American Wikimania could be a little smaller, but we would still need a suitable facility. It would be good to know that such a facility is available for a conference; the type of youth hostel facility that was used in Frankfurt does not exist in North America. What would be the cost of hosting such a conference at UBC?

I'm looking for interest and commitment. To that end I am proposing a Vancouver meetup for Saturday, Sept. 24. If someone has a reasonably accesible place for such a meeting please let me know. (I live in Richmond, but something in the city of Vancouver would be more appropriate.) I am spammiong this to all Vancouver area Wikipedians that I can find. Please reply to my talk page. Eclecticology 21:50:16, 2005-09-03 (UTC)

Ryunosuke Akutagawa

Hi, good thing you corrected the name. However, copying the old page into the new one is not the correct way to do it -- it lost all the edit history. The correct way is to use "Move this page". Please ask an admin to actually swap the articles s as to keep the edit history. Thanks. Jorge Stolfi 01:19, 17 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Urban parks

Thanks for your reply and research on my question.

Noticed your user name before, editing the article on Tsawwassen (where I grew up), hi from a fellow Vancouverite. - Dharmabum420 21:35, 18 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:CentralParkManhattan.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:CentralParkManhattan.jpg. However, the image may soon be deleted unless we can determine the copyright holder and copyright status. The Wikimedia Foundation is very careful about the images included in Wikipedia because of copyright law (see Wikipedia's Copyright policy).

The copyright holder is usually the creator, the creator's employer, or the last person who was transferred ownership rights. Copyright information on images on Wikipedia is signified using copyright templates. The three basic license types on Wikipedia are open content, public domain, and fair use. Find the appropriate template in Wikipedia:Image copyright tags and place it on the image page like this: {{TemplateName}}.

Please signify the copyright information on any other images you have uploaded or will upload. Remember that images without this important information can be deleted by an administrator. You can get help on image copyright tagging from Wikipedia talk:Image copyright tags. --OrphanBot 09:18, 21 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Just van Rossum

I have placed a tag on the article Just van Rossum, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. I did this because the article seems to be a biographical account about a person, group of people, or band, but it does not indicate how or why he/she/they is/are notable. If you can indicate why Just van Rossum is really notable, I advise you to edit the article promptly, and also put a note on Talk:Just van Rossum. Any admin should check for such edits before deleting the article. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. You might also want to read our criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 7 under Articles. You might also want to read our general biography criteria. Please do not just remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. -- No Guru 19:18, 24 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. I've just removed the speedy tag from this article. At first glance it was difficult to see the notability of the subject. Sorry about that ! No Guru 20:14, 24 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Wikimedia Canada

Hi there! I'd like to invite you to explore Wikimedia Canada, and create a list of people interested in forming a local chapter for our nation. A local chapter will help promote and improve the organization, within our great nation. We'd also like to encourage everyone to suggest projects for our national chapter to participate in. Hope to see you there!--DarkEvil 17:11, 20 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject on Sign language, Deaf culture, and deafness

Hi, I am writing you in regards to a proposed WikiProject I am a part of: User:Ntennis/Deaf WikiProject proposal. You have previously contributed to/ expressed interest in Deaf related articles and thus we thought you might be interested in participating in our WikiProject. If you are, please add your name to the list at either User:Ntennis/Deaf WikiProject proposal or Wikipedia:Wikiproject/List of proposed projects#Deaf and give your input! Thank you! Gaep13^(talk) 02:41, 8 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Citation

Hi, I note your comment 'citation needed' on the A600 page. I've added two citations, both verifiable because the sources are right here next to me. How do I link the footnotes to the text? - Richardcavell 06:54, 13 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Marvin

Hi, I'm just here to ~~spoil your day~~ inform you of something; the image on your user page of Marvin the Paranoid Android has to go. Not my call, but the image is fair use; therefore, we can't use it on our user pages. Sorry to be the bringer of bad news, but that's Wikipedia. Thanks! M ^o P 05:51, 29 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Re:Francesco Aquilini contribution is a copyright violation

I didn't create the article. I just tagged it with WikiProject and Vancouver stubs. Check History. Buchanan-H e rmit™..CONTRIBS..SPEAK! 22:06, 30 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

No worries. I've done something similiar myself several times. :) Buchanan-H e rmit™..CONTRIBS..SPEAK! 01:04, 31 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

West Vancouver

I've cited the one (about Canada's first shopping mall) and removed the other (uniquely in Canada - my sources don't say it and that really is a grey one because things like that might happen in smaller cities), basically everything there is coming from the 3 sources listed below. Thanks for taking a look! -- Tawker 07:24, 5 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

West Vancouver

You mind if I cite everything to this official census report w/ the numbers for the cite needed. It's odd, the census report (for the 2001 census) shows the population to be 4 off, its weird! Cheers -- Tawker 04:10, 10 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, that one was a census breakdown graph showing that fact, let me see if its for free online -- Tawker 04:17, 10 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, I've cited it. Sorry about the slow reply, my talk page turned into a party after my promotion hence I couldn't get anything done :o -- Tawker 05:08, 10 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image Tagging for Image:MovieMario.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:MovieMario.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 11:47, 24 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Straw hat american.jpg

Image:Straw hat american.jpg|thumb|Straw Hat I noticed that the image is tagged with ({{PD}}), which is obsolete. Please consider one of the replacment tags.

Also, if you have a higher resolution version of the image, you may want to upload it over this image (the old version is kept in the history). I really like the photo. --Midnightcomm 04:18, 9 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Searching around, I see that the source site does not want the image redistributed.

SELLING AND REDISTRIBUTION OF THE IMAGE (INDIVIDUALLY OR ALONG WITH OTHER IMAGES) IS STRICTLY FORBIDDEN! DO NOT SHARE THE IMAGE WITH OTHERS![1]

—Preceding unsigned comment added by Midnightcomm (talk • contribs)

Midnightcomm, the "selling and redistribution" notice was not present when the image was published over two years ago on the source site. It had the simple caption "There are no usage restrictions for this photo.", as noted on the file upload page. Thanks for the heads up. If someone thinks this image should be deleted, so be it. --Ds13 20:31, 9 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image Tagging Image:Bodies of water in Vancouver BLANK.jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Bodies of water in Vancouver BLANK.jpg. I notice the 'image' page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then there needs to be an argument why we have the right to use the media on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then it needs to be specified where it was found, i.e., in most cases link to the website where it was taken from, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag then one should be added. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{Non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other media, consider checking that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. —Bkell (talk) 22:43, 1 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The image's history shows a GFDL tag by myself. I'll take a look again. It also describes the history of the image as having been derived (by me) from a public domain image: Image:Vancouver_Landsat.jpg Hope that clears it up for you. --Ds13

It wasn't a claim, it's truth

The CCNC site claims stupid things like Chinese miners didn't make money, didn't know how to mine, that there was one death per foot of the Fraser Canyon (something like 150,000 dead+ if true,which it's not) and one biased inaccuracy after another; material to back this up posted later; the pretentious of sinocentric histories of Canada is a major problem; and the CCNC is not a valid source, given their penchant for distorting history to suit their "we were victimized agenda".Skookum1 23:25, 9 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Skookum1. I objected to your unencyclopedic commentary ("The history on this site is heavily distorted and contains many inaccuracies and outright untruths") in the History of Chinese immigration to Canada article. So thank you for leaving that comment out, if it means losing the link. I'm not familiar with all of the CCNC's truths or lies. But that organization is decades old and appears to have reached a level of notability/significant/recognition in Canadian media that allows it visibility in an encyclopedia, even if they spread some lies. If you're equipped to supply critical, verifiable content about this organization, the Chinese Canadian National Council article might benefit from it. Cheers. --Ds13 00:52, 10 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Reply on my talk page about CCNC link

Hi; replied just now; letting you know here but the info/link requested is on my talk page.Skookum1 08:16, 10 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Fraser Canyon War, McGowan's War et al

Just finished through-writing the former by memory, and expanding the latter from someone else's expansion of my original stub. Check 'em out. Gotta go to the beach and a barbeque now....Skookum1 20:29, 15 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Ruskin, British Columbia - refs added

Hi; saw you're the one put the refs tag on this; I'm the guilty party who created it (my home turf); will try to find an illustrative picture of Ruskin proper, or shoot one maybe, but I might find some old archivals when the mills were in full swing, or of the old corner store at least; I certainly have some pics to illustrate the points about the powerhouse/dam design; on that particular issue I have to admit to original research, as I did a thing on BC Hydro architecture for a long-ago cultural geograpy course at SFU and the prof corrected me on the neo-classicism bit when I said it was gothic; but he did say that there was some deco touches to it; ideally an older picture will give the whole image, as the dam and bridge were lined with gothic/London-style metal lanters (long taken down due to vandalism in the early '70s) and another different set adorning the top cornice of the powerhouse (the insides of which are all oak and brass and like something out of a sci-fi/horror movie from the '30s). The refs I've provided are all that I know of in print, with the Miller book being the one that gets into the Ruskinite-commune origins of the settlement and its name; I can dig up some aboriginal history, such as it is, eventually (the other Sto:lo call the people who lived here Skayuks - "everybody died"); and there's some archaeological bits here and there which I'll dig up. Hope that'll suffice.Skookum1 07:43, 20 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Squamish - disambig page needed methinks

I'd put a note on Talk:Squamish quite a while ago but just last night 43-Man Squamish and the Squamish (fraternity) (no link/article is Rutgers) at Rutgers were added as "See alsos". You're the first other BC editor I've seen work from this morning so throwing it by you, maybe Usgnus and ?? as to what to do; leave the primary page as referring to the wind - surely an old BC word, but not that common anymore - and surely not the primary meaning anymore, which is either the town or the people, and secondarily the language. Thoughts? I'll do the transfer rather than take up your time, if you don't have any; just wanting corroboration (and it's stuff like this I think there should be a WikiProject:British Columbia for sorting out....Chilcotin, Lillooet and other pages were the same - only one meaning given, and often not the primary one - when I got thereSkookum1 16:30, 20 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Saw your comment on Talk:Squamish; I'll research how many links I/(we?) have to change in order to do the disambig, 'cause it bugs me every time I look at that page; small-s squamish is definitely a BC word, kinda archaic, but it's hardly what joe-user thinks of when he hears the word. Thought I'd ask your opinion on Saanich, which someone has proposed should go to Saanich, British Columbia; A disambig seems best there too, as there's also Saanich Peninsula and maybe Saanich-something-else...oh yeah, electoral districts (Saanich and the Islands, North Saanich and the Islands) also formerly different Saanich municipalities (North, Central etc). Saanich language has its own special name anyway (Sencotem q.v.) and it's really/also North Straits Salish which AFAIK includes Lummi and some other state-side dialects/groups. I'm also scratching my head on how to deal with stuff in my own Lillooet-country turf - see St'at'imc - as, say, with Shalalth there's non-native history/communities intertangled; and within the Indigenous peoples Wikiproject we've been trying to make clear separations between articles on ethno/culture, language, political organizations, and communities as such; means a lot of stub-like articles, potentially; in the case of Shalalth I'm thinking Tsalalh, the St'at'imcets spelling, be used for the specifics of the rancherie, and Shalalth for the general history of the milieu. All pretty specific to me, but I think you get an idea what I'm up against; it's worse up in Carrier country, and Okanagan and Shuswap, too...Skookum1 18:25, 28 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Not sure if I sent you an invite to join the draft [British Columbia]. Also check out: BC & Pacific Northwest History Forum Only Heqs and I have been using it so far; intent is to flesh it out with map, historical photos links, texts from out-of-print/uncopyrighted/archival newspapers as historical resources etc.

____________________________________________________________ANMORE_____________________ On the anmore talk page I explained what politically independent village meant, I hope that clears up your confusion cheers, from British Columbia

Why did you change my GFDL tag to a PD one?

I believe the image of notes on a scale does not have enough original authorship to qualify for a copyright. GFDL is only used to release material that can be copyrighted. -Nv8200p talk 15:40, 24 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. Response on your talk page. --Ds13 15:45, 24 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Sullivan

I had the same idea as you and uploaded a new picture of Sullivan from the same flikr collection: [Image:Sam Sullivan Olympic Flag.jpg]. I changed it back after finding out that the "non-commercial" part of the CC license makes it a serious deletable offense on Wikipedia. In other words, unless you are the actual photographer (in which case that should be made more clearly on the photo's page), the old picture is more acceptable on wikipedia.Bobanny 03:10, 19 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the heads up. Since the previous SamSullivan.jpg image is also described as being both non-commercial and copyrighted (though some would argue, fair-use, but still copyrighted), I think the current image is a step towards free. Replacing it with a copyrighted image again may be a step backwards, so removing the image completely, without replacing it by the copyrighted image, may be the best course at this point. But I'll wait for others, if any, to chime in on this. --Ds13 04:38, 19 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

It would seem reasonable that that image is a step closer to a free image (and that's what I thought), but that's not how the Wikipedia powers that be see it. The specific tag for the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 2.0 results in a "speedy deletion" notice going on the page, and Wikipedia:Image copyright tags lists it in the "Non-free Creative Commons licenses" section, along with this warning: "Do not upload images for which one of the tags in this section applies."

The old photo is apparently more acceptable because it was released explicitly as a publicity photo, same as photos for movie stars and such, and therefore fair use on those grounds. The old pic comes from the NPA, and isn't owned by the Canadian government as the current tag states.

My personal opinion is that it's not a time-sensitive issue and not urgent. The worst that will happen is that an admin will eventually delete the photo and then we're back to where we started. With either photo, it's simply filler until someone snaps a photo and releases it to the public. It will have to be fixed before this beast ever makes it to featured article or even GA. And yeah, you're right; it's not crucial that we have a picture of smilin' Sam at all. IMO, leave it and maybe take his mug off after we get some more pictures of humans.Bobanny 05:24, 19 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the link to clarify. Yup, sounds like it's gonna be deleted. C'est la vie. I'm sure an alternative will show up. --Ds13 05:51, 19 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Vancouver

Please read the talk page to see why I removed the paragraph about street signs. I'm trying to get the article GA'd, and the reviewer said that had to be better sourced. Flickr.com fails WP:RS. ---- Selmo ^(talk) 01:31, 21 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I don't follow. The paragraph is still there. And if you don't like Flikr as a source, please read the Punjabi Market (Vancouver) article and note the image. (Same one I linked to via Flikr.) --Ds13 03:03, 21 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

My only problem with the flickr link was the fact that it changes constantly. A photo works fine Thanks. -- Selmo ^(talk) 03:32, 21 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

License for Image:Sam_Sullivan_portrait.jpg

Hi, I have changed the license for Image:Sam_Sullivan_portrait.jpg with the same license at the source. According to WP copyright policy, non-commercial images cannot be used in WP, thus it is a candidate for speedy deletion. — Indon (reply) — 15:08, 6 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Vancouver and the Panama Canal

I've got to go to bed (to get up at 4:30am yikes) but one last quick note spun off your addition of the citation request and the relationship between Vancouver and the Panama Canal. It was the opening of the CPR (the first British-controlled transcontinental railway, since the Union Pacific and Northern Pacific and I think at least one other transcontinental railway had already been finished in 1886) that placed Vancouver in a key point in international trade, as the shipping time from Hong Kong to London via San Francisco-New York was 45 days, via Vancouver-Montreal it was 27 days (cite Morley's Milltown to Metropolis book somewhere, also in Maj. Matthews' Early Vancouver in a passing reference somewhere). The Panama railroad was a bit of competition, but still a bit slower and also not under British control, which was the point of Vancouver, which was one of the lynchpins in the "All Red Route" (note the redlink, as that should have an article), which went around the globe entirely via British ports and soil (e.g. Bombay-Singapore-Hong Kong-Vancouver), I guess via the Cape of Good Hope earlier on before the British took over Palestine, Jordan and Iraq after the collapse of the Ottomans. Anyway, when the Panama Canal opened int'l shipping was largely diverted from Vancouver via the newer, shorter route, which also didn't have to contend with the icefloes of the St. Lawrence and its Gulf (even though it wasn't "All Red", i.e. not British). Gotta zzzz now, but after scanning the article tonight I thought the second paragraph was a bit rambling and "all over the map", full of non sequiturs as it were; doesn't hang together; also the last sentence of the first paragraph makes it sound like the ethnic diversity is entirely due to the Asian influx; Vancouver was always mult-ethnic, including a wide palette of European (i.e. non-British) ethnicities as well as of many different flavours of Brit, most straight from the Isles and not part of the usual Canada-Maritimes anglo-celtic stock. Don't have time to "make it flow", that is) right now but just a heads-up that if this is going to be a featured article that second paragraph needs a rewrite/revamp: it seems cluttered.Skookum1 09:17, 16 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Wow, good brain dump, there! Thanks. I don't have time to roll up the sleeves right now myself but I agree there's some lack of flow and connection. --Ds13 16:59, 16 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks!

Thanks for your contribution to the Musical Notation Article (Enthnomusicology...the Shakuhachi contribution). I have TRIED to bring a more ethnic flavour to this Article, but what can we do when Western musical notation dominates most of the world? I've spent many hours revising the article tonight...not removing any material, adding some, but mainly trying to "get it in order". Section 4 seems terribly lengthy...I wouldn't mind seeing it trimmed a little! Any further ideas? Prof.rick 08:24, 13 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Great User Page!

I like your User Page. It says it all. Most of all, "be nice"! Prof.rick 08:28, 13 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:CentralParkManhattan.jpg listed for deletion

Dear uploader: The media file you uploaded as Image:CentralParkManhattan.jpg has been listed for speedy deletion because you selected a copyright license type implying some type of restricted use, such as for non-commercial use only, or for educational use only or for use on Wikipedia by permission. While it might seem reasonable to assume that such files can be freely used on Wikipedia, a non-profit website, this is in fact not the case. Please do not upload any more files with these restrictions on them, because content on Wikipedia needs to be compatible with the GNU Free Documentation License, which allows anyone to use it for any purpose, commercial or non-commercial.

If you created this media file and want to use it on Wikipedia, you may re-upload it (or amend the image description if it has not yet been deleted) and use the license {{GFDL-self}} to license it under the GFDL, or {{cc-by-sa-2.5}} to license it under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license, or use {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain.

If you did not create this media file but want to use it on Wikipedia, there are two ways to proceed. First, you may choose one of the fair use tags from this list if you believe one of those fair use rationales applies to this file. Second, you may want to contact the copyright holder and request that they make the media available under a free license.

If you have any questions please ask at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you. Jesse Viviano 22:55, 3 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree Image:CPUs_old.jpg

An image that you uploaded from stock.xchng or altered, Image:CPUs_old.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images#SXC_images because its copyright status is disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. Please go to its page for more information if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. OrphanBot 03:07, 9 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

03:07, 9 March 2007 (UTC)

Commercial use of Image:Punjabi Market Vancouver street sign.jpg

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Image:Punjabi Market Vancouver street sign.jpg, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Image:Punjabi Market Vancouver street sign.jpg is an image licensed as "for non-commercial use only" or "used with permission for use on Wikipedia only" which was either uploaded on or after 2005-05-19 or is not used in any articles (CSD I3).

If you created this media file and want to use it on Wikipedia, you may re-upload it (or amend the image description if it has not yet been deleted) and use the license {{GFDL-self}} to license it under the GFDL, or {{cc-by-sa-2.5}} to license it under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license, or use {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain.

If you did not create this media file but want to use it on Wikipedia, there are two ways to proceed. First, you may choose one of the fair use tags from this list if you believe one of those fair use rationales applies to this file. Second, you may want to contact the copyright holder and request that they make the media available under a free license.

If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. This bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion, it did not nominate Image:Punjabi Market Vancouver street sign.jpg itself. Feel free to leave a message on the bot operator's talk page if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot. If you have any questions about what to do next or why your image was nominated for speedy deletion please ask at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thanks. --Android Mouse Bot 2 12:59, 30 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free use disputed for Image:Frank Denyer A Monkeys Paw.jpg

This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Frank Denyer A Monkeys Paw.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 09:01, 4 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable fair use Image:DeepakChopra_GrowYounger_Cover.jpg

Replaceable fair use

Thanks for uploading Image:DeepakChopra_GrowYounger_Cover.jpg. I noticed the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:

Go to the image description page and edit it to add {{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or a similar) image under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that fair use images which could be replaced by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if not used in an article), per our Fair Use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. – Quadell ^{(talk) (random)} 19:56, 19 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:PythonPowered.gif

Thanks for uploading Image:PythonPowered.gif. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 06:30, 21 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Vancouver Canadians logo.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Vancouver Canadians logo.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 02:37, 7 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Agnosticism

Hello Ds13. How are you? Your comments were civil. I like the way you argue. Take care! Masterpiece2000 (talk) 05:21, 24 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. Likewise. All the best. --Ds13 (talk) 06:11, 24 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your note. Regards, Masterpiece2000 (talk) 06:15, 24 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

impressive gardens

Tht wording/suggestion is in the sources; de hullu and lewis Green; with even more effusive wording. I don't have them here but just to let y0ou know it's not as pov as it sounds. if you lived in minto and you neighbour could grow vegetables and landscpe nice gardens on rocky ground with no resources you'd nber impressed too... .Skookum1 (talk) 14:07, 13 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Atsuya Okuda The Sound of Zen.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Atsuya Okuda The Sound of Zen.jpg. You've indicated that the image meets Wikipedia's criteria for non-free content, but there is no explanation of why it meets those criteria. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. If you have any questions, please post them at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

Thank you for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 11:27, 21 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image (Image:Atsuya Okuda The Sound of Zen.jpg)

⚠

Thanks for uploading Image:Atsuya Okuda The Sound of Zen.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Beloved Freak 19:06, 1 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Circle of fifths graphic

Hi, editors are developing a new Circle of fifths graphic. We could use your input. --Jtir (talk) 17:49, 25 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Faceball2000 gb screenshot.gif

Thanks for uploading Image:Faceball2000 gb screenshot.gif. You've indicated that the image is being used under a claim of fair use, but you have not provided an adequate explanation for why it meets Wikipedia's requirements for such images. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check

That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for each article the image is used in.
That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --FairuseBot (talk) 04:49, 11 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

WP:PUI Nominations

Just dropping you a note about having listed some images you have uploaded at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images/2008 December 20#More SXC images, seeing as they appear to be sourced from http://www.sxc.hu and tagged as free licensed without a confirmation that the photographer who uploaded it to sxc.hu has granted permission to use this license. The images are File:Swiss Army knife.jpg, File:Motorcycle helmet three quarter.jpg, File:Neon signage Club.jpg, File:Shock sign.jpg and File:Straw hat american.jpg. --Sherool (talk) 19:08, 20 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

File:St roch ice.jpg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:St roch ice.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Calliopejen1 (talk) 00:29, 13 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of File:Vancouver aerial lostlagoon.jpg

A tag has been placed on File:Vancouver aerial lostlagoon.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section I9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted images or text borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. ViperSnake151 18:53, 31 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Yo scale

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Yo scale, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:

unreferenced

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Hyacinth (talk) 16:03, 11 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Never mind. Hyacinth (talk) 19:07, 21 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for deletion nomination of GoatTracker

I have nominated GoatTracker, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/GoatTracker. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Pcap ping 01:17, 4 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Nanalan Russell Mona.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Nanalan Russell Mona.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:33, 20 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Vancouver Wikipedia 10th Anniversary Meetup

The Interior cordially invites you to the Vancouver Wikipedia 10th Anniversary Meetup! It is being held at Benny's Bagels at 2505 W Broadway. Meetup will start at 6:30pm. Drop by for some Wikipedia-style conviviality and free gear! Feel free to forward this invitation to any Wikipedians who might be able to attend, and visit the discussion page to suggest activities. Hope to see you there and have a Happy 2011!

Proposed deletion of George Stiny

The article George Stiny has been proposed for deletion because, under Wikipedia policy, all newly created biographies of living persons must have at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't take offense. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. The-Pope (talk) 16:57, 14 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Hacker Emblem for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Hacker Emblem is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hacker Emblem until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Elinruby (talk) 01:24, 4 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

SkyTrain Ridership Number

See my talk page for instruction of how to get the numbers. It can be found within the document, but they're not viewable without downloading and editing it. The number given in the document provide the percentage of all Canada Line boardings in 2009, and you can calculate the actual boarding count with the total boardings given in the second reference. The number should be reliable since it comes directly from TransLink, but just don't know how to reference it properly. 66.183.40.56 (talk) 08:24, 16 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free rationale for File:Saeki Ramos CD.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Saeki Ramos CD.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 12:07, 29 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Ear Training links

Regarding the ear training radio link you keep removing it without a proper reason. This link has the same right to be used as the other ear training exercise websites, because it's a useful ear training resource. It is notable because it's the only ear training radio on the Web. And it's free. Eartraining (talk) 22:43, 29 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! My proposal at the ear training article is that none of the product links have a "right" to be there unless they are notable. Wikipedia is not a collection of links and if a product has notability, as verifiable by a reliable, secondary source, then it can appear in the article text itself. You're making a factual claim about your product being notable... so this is progress! You'll need a reliable, secondary source for that claim. Let's continue this discussion at the article talk page so others may chime in on both your position and mine. Thanks! --Ds13 (talk) 22:57, 29 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I think you obviously prefer some links and dislike anything else. Never mind. Not fair at all. Eartraining (talk) 17:37, 30 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I'll say it again: my proposal is to remove *all* external links, unless some can be proven notable via a reliable secondary source. I don't see *any* in that category, BTW. Please reflect on this and tell me why you say it's obvious I prefer some links and dislike others. --Ds13 (talk) 01:56, 2 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of SPOT Satellite GPS Messenger

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on SPOT Satellite GPS Messenger, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Business for more information.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. -- Alan Liefting (talk) - 05:27, 4 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Barnstar

		The Original Barnstar
		This barnstar is awarded to everyone who - whatever their opinion - contributed to the discussion about Wikipedia and SOPA. Thank you for being a part of the discussion. Presented by the Wikimedia Foundation.

File:D Yo scale.png listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:D Yo scale.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 16:15, 23 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Additive synthesis

Hi Ds13, care to have a look at Talk:Additive_synthesis? There is a dispute on whether the sinusoidal definition (3) should be treated as the main definition in the article, and a third opinion would be welcome. Olli Niemitalo (talk) 11:25, 3 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the help. Olli Niemitalo (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 14:18, 4 February 2012 (UTC).[reply]

Disambiguation link notification

Hi. When you recently edited Ruby on Rails, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Agile (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:39, 11 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

(",)

Thank you to for your encyclopedic contributions to Royal Canadian Mint of MintChip. Please see wp:TEA. 97.87.29.188 (talk) 20:11, 18 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Thanks for noticing. The Determinator p t c 03:12, 25 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free rationale for File:Watazumi Doso Rinbo Yondai.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Watazumi Doso Rinbo Yondai.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 10:43, 22 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

SkyTrain (Vancouver)

You misunderstood the passage in your recent edit. Transit Security do conduct fare audits (and will have the power to ticket fare evasion beginning Sept, 2012) along with Transit Police. However, Security are not police officers. --Cahk (talk) 00:56, 9 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, I should have left the Transit Security in that fact. Both the police officers and Transit Security staff check fares. Article has been updated. Cheers. --Ds13 (talk) 16:40, 9 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Credo Reference

I'm sorry to report that there were not enough accounts available for you to have one. I have you on our list though and if more become available we will notify you promptly.

We're continually working to bring resources like Credo to Wikipedia editors, and this will very hopefully not be your last opportunity to sign up for one. If you haven't already, please check out WP:HighBeam and WP:Questia, where accounts are still available. Cheers, Ocaasi 19:12, 22 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your approved HighBeam code failed to deliver: please email Ocaasi

Hi! Good news: you were approved for a free WP:HighBeam account. Bad news: Your access code could not be delivered because of your email settings. Please:

Email me at wikiocaasi@yahoo.com with your Wikipedia username so I can respond with your account code.

Thanks! --User:Ocaasi 15:15, 30 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your free 1-year HighBeam Research account is approved!

Good news! You are approved for access to 80 million articles in 6500 publications through HighBeam Research.

The 1-year, free period begins when you enter the code you were emailed. If you did not receive a code, email wikiocaasi@yahoo.com your Wikipedia username.
To activate your account: 1) Go to http://www.highbeam.com/prof1
If you need assistance, email or ask User:Ocaasi. Please, per HighBeam's request, do not call the toll-free number for assistance with registration.
A quick reminder about using the account: 1) try it out; 2) provide original citation information, in addition to linking to a HighBeam article; 3) avoid bare links to non-free HighBeam pages; 4) note "(subscription required)" in the citation, where appropriate. Examples are at WP:HighBeam/Citations.
HighBeam would love to hear feedback at WP:HighBeam/Experiences
Show off your HighBeam access by placing {{User:Ocaasi/highbeam_userbox}} on your userpage
When the 1-year period is up, check applications page to see if renewal is possible. We hope it will be.

Thanks for helping make Wikipedia better. Enjoy your research! Cheers, Ocaasi 15:27, 30 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

Stubs: Lake City Way Station; Great Vancouver Fire; Elías García Martínez; András József Szennay; Holdom Station; Technogym; Production Way – University Station; Burquitlam Station; Wilfried Böse; Allan La Fontaine; Hastings Mill; Tensta; Newton Town Centre; Robert Rodman; Ri Yong-ho; Port Kells; Rupert Station; Jérôme Proulx; Crescent Beach, British Columbia

Cleanup: Blender (software); Continuum (TV series); Spotify
Merge: Guildford Town Centre; Kulin Kayastha; Lexcycle Stanza
Add Sources: Boson; Richard L. Peterson; Granville, British Columbia
Wikify: Shravan; Social network analysis software; Robotic book scanner
Expand: William Weintraub; Ductility; AI effect

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 03:39, 15 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your free 1-year Questia online library account is approved ready

Good news! You are approved for access to 77,000 full-text books and 4 million journal, magazine, newspaper articles, and encyclopedia entries. Check your Wikipedia email!

Go to https://www.questia.com/specialoffer
Input your unique Offer ID and Promotional code. Click Continue. (Note that the activation codes are one-time use only and are case-sensitive).
Create your account by entering the requested information. (This is private and no one from Wikipedia will see it).
You'll then see the welcome page with your Login ID. (The account is now active for 1 year).

If you need help, please first ask Ocaasi at wikiocaasi@yahoo.com and, second, email QuestiaHelp@cengage.com along with your Offer ID and Promotional Code (subject: Wikipedia).

A quick reminder about using the account: 1) try it out; 2) provide original citation information, in addition to linking to a Questia article; 3) avoid bare links to non-free Questia pages; 4) note "(subscription required)" in the citation, where appropriate. Examples are at WP:Questia/Citations.
Questia would love to hear feedback at WP:Questia/Experiences
Show off your Questia access by placing {{User:Ocaasi/Questia_userbox}} on your userpage
When the 1-year period is up, check the applications page to see if renewal is possible. We hope it will be.

Thanks for helping make Wikipedia better. Enjoy your research! Cheers, Ocaasi EdwardsBot (talk) 05:04, 19 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Ticker symbols in article leads

Hi. I noticed you removed a few ticker symbols from article leads. Thanks for the help! :-) I may generate a report of these at some point. For now, I've just been clicking through uses of {{NASDAQ}}. --MZMcBride (talk) 19:35, 26 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Many hands make light work. Happy to help. --Ds13 (talk) 19:41, 26 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

By the way: Wikipedia:Village pump (policy)#Wikipedia:Ticker symbols in article leads and acting upon this essay as policy. --MZMcBride (talk) 15:20, 29 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Requesting admin help for a template change

{{admin help}} Hi. It would appear that an admin (or additional process) is required to effect a change in Template:Infobox video game. Can you please advise? There is a discussion, with some support but without consensus, on the talk page. Disclosure: my position is to support a small change and it is explained on the talk page. Thanks for any insight. --Ds13 (talk) 19:54, 30 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Place an {{Edit protected}} (without the tlx part) on the template's talk page, in the section where the change is discussed. You should do that only after there's clearly a consensus for the change; if there's not, you'll need to handle the dispute resolution part first.. You should know, also, that it may take a while for an admin to respond, as many admins like myself don't edit templates out of a lack of understanding of the intricate syntax required. Qwyrxian (talk)

My apologies

It looks like we were editing Flight (2012 film) at the same time — both of us trimming the plot! I didn't mean to overwrite your version. Mine is 694 words and, of course, please do make any other or alternate edits. Again, my apologies. At least we were going for the same thing!--Tenebrae (talk) 23:06, 4 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

No sweat. I made a few further reductions. --Ds13 (talk) 23:18, 4 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Ticker symbols in article leads and next steps

Hi. I'm contacting you as you participated in the policy village pump discussion regarding ticker symbols in article leads.

I've posted a section here about next steps to take, specifically examining whether an RFC is needed to reach a clear consensus on this issue. If you have the time and/or inclination to weigh in, please do! --MZMcBride (talk) 18:43, 7 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

An experiment

I'm trying an experiment.

The backlog at Wikipedia:Copyright problems is horrific, and frankly, embarrassing.

In a discussion with Moonriddengirl, the goddess of copyright, someone mentioned that they couldn't help out because they weren't an admin.

I wondered if other editors were under the same assumption.

Changing gears slightly, I think it is important for admin to have a working knowledge of copyright issues, as admins have the power to delete articles identified as copyright violations.

It occurred to me that we ought to find out whether prospective admins do have a solid knowledge of copyright issues and it occurs to me that one way to determine that is if editors contemplating becoming an admin work on a couple hundred items in the backlog. This would help establish several useful things:

I won't lie, clearing copyright backlogs isn't exciting, but admins are expected to help out with unexciting tasks, so this is one way to see if the candidate is willing to do those types of things
Working on clearing out a backlog is an excellent way to develop a knowledge of copyright issues. Without the delete button, you can't accidentally remove something which might turn out to be acceptable, so you can identify issues, clean up where appropriate, and make a recommendation for deletion if that's the best option. Then an admin can make the final call, and will be in a position to opine positively at a future RfA.
A major side benefit will be the reduction of the backlog

Brand-new editors may not have the experience with copyright issues to dive in and help out. But someone who has self-identified as interested in being an admin someday, has probably been around long enough to get a feel for copyright issues, and if not that specifically, has been around long enough to know how to proceed carefully.

So I looked at the transclusion of the User box indicating that you would consider becoming an admin someday, and your name was the third on the list.

So my experiment is to see if you might be a candidate to take a stab at looking at some of the item in the backlog.

There's no rush, and you can do it on your own, or you can ask me to be a mentor, (or you can decide that it isn't your cup of tea.) If you are interested, Wikipedia:Text Copyright Violations 101 is as close as we have to a user's manual.

But keeping Wikipedia free of copyright violations is one of the most important tasks around, so if you are willing to pitch in, we will be very grateful.--SPhilbrick (Talk) 00:12, 18 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Cracked numbers

That IS the place and person who releases non-Top-30 Canadian ratings information and Cracked isn't a weekly top 30 show. You might want to look into WHO it is rather than simply dismissing it because of WHERE you find it. "Self-published material may be acceptable when produced by an established expert on the topic of the article whose work in the relevant field has previously been published by reliable third-party publications." For years he worked for the Toronto Sun as their tv columnist but parted ways after some disagreements with new management. Now he freelances with regular articles for Canadian Press and he had a ratings column on TorStar's Toronto.com but that was discontinued, possibly because it doesn't fit with the rest of the site. If you want to call him a non-reliable source then you would strip out most information on Canadian tv ratings because he is the only one who covers shows that don't crack the weekly top 30, which BBM does publicly release data regarding. BBM only releases non-Top-30 information to broadcasters and approved journalists, of which he is apparently the only one to report on nearly the whole prime time schedule each week. For a while he did so on Twitter with daily updates but with the new year he has come back to the blog and weekly round-up. He's the Canadian version of TVByTheNumbers but primarily based on Blogspot rather than Zap2it. If you think about it, TVBTN isn't even run by guys who have worked in TV but are simply fans who found a niche business opportunity so they could arguably be less reliable. ;) Or in short, per WP:USERG i reverted your edit removing the information. delirious & lost ☯ ^~hugs~ 21:52, 16 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

(copied back to here from my talk page because i hate splitting conversations. delirious & lost ☯ ^~hugs~)
Hi. Thanks for the response about putting the Bill Brioux blog reference back in the Cracked article. I do understand that Brioux works in the space and blogs regularly about TV, but the point of my edit (I tried to convey this in the edit comment) is that Brioux is not generating these numbers; he's copying and pasting those from the source that actually measures or estimates viewership. For example, CBC itself would be considered a primary source for viewership, though their own reports of viewership might still be acceptable (if qualified). Ideally, a secondary source measures or estimates or verifies viewership and reports it. Hopefully we can agree that such a source would be the best reference, rather than yet another person in the chain (Brioux) copying and pasting into a self-published blog. I'm not suggesting Brioux is adding bias, but mistakes happen, and I don't see him making any claims of editing or others involved in fact-checking. So if his blog would simply link to ITS source of numbers, then our readers could verify for themselves. (The link in question.) Stated simply: where does Brioux get his numbers from (surely he's not creating them), and why do we not let our Wikipedia readers know about it? Perhaps we will disagree on this -- have a good day. --Ds13 (talk) 23:26, 16 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I think what you are missing is that the numbers for shows are not made available to just anyone who fancies to look them up. BBM publishes the weekly top 30 for any who are so interested but the data for every show is only made available to broadcasters and certain journalists. Most Canadian media outlets apparently don't give a shit for reporting such things, unlike in the USA where there are a variety of places which do and TVByTheNumbers.com which has that as their primary reason for existing. In the USA only the weekly Top 25 for a few categories are offered on Neilsen's website and people must subscribe to get anything else. TVBTN is "copying and pasting into a self-published blog" (they use wordpress instead of blogger). They make use of tables. TFMF has the information in prose. "So if his blog would simply link to ITS source of numbers, then our readers could verify for themselves." What you are asking for is open access to proprietary information and that just isn't going to happen for Canadian or American shows. It would be like demanding the recipe for Coke or proof of how they get the caramel inside the Caramilk bar.
The BBM weekly top 30 can be found at https://www.bbm.ca/en/weekly-top-30-tv-programs I have almost every weekly .pdf going back to September 2003 when they switched from .html as the publication format. It used to be a weekly Top 20 shows. BBM only offers as far back as the start of the 2009-10 season on their website. For all the shows which don't make it into the top 30 the options are what Bill Brioux reports on or wait until it is considered historical data and is made available at the Ryerson University Library. I am not sure what constitutes "historical data" but it is likely at least a few years. One would still need to go to Ryerson to research it since it isn't online.
If your argument were about a US show's data you would have to be approved for a paid subscription with Neilsen in order to see it for yourself. Even then it would be just you and not everyone who would be able to verify the accuracy of the content of TVBTN.
If this were about some news article it would be equivalent to insisting that the reporter make available to her readers all of her notes and sources (documents and people) in addition to the published article.
You are never going to get the level of access that you are wanting here unless you become the journalist who is reporting on the subject or work for the ratings company. BBM's data useage guidelines (https://www.bbm.ca/en/data-usage-guidelines) are much more restrictive than those of Neilsen, which is why we don't see demographic rating/share information for Canadian TV shows. If not for Mr Brioux being interested in it and reporting on it himself there would be nothing but weekly Top 30 and broadcaster press releases and many, many shows would have no viewership coverage in the media at all. That he chooses to use blogspot rather than paid hosting and a personal domain shouldn't be used against him. He has a career spanning decades covering Canadian television production and ratings. I would say he is the epitome of a reliable self-publisher. Plus his set visit to Defiance (TV series) and set visit plus extra in Murdoch Mysteries's episode filmed in Dawson were just pretty cool. Bill Harris, John Doyle, and Rob Salem don't usually go to that extent when covering TV in Canada. Those 'big 3' will review shows but i don't recall ever seeing anything from any of them regarding shows' ratings. delirious & lost ☯ ^~hugs~ 01:10, 17 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Interesting stuff. Fairly surprising, actually. So thanks for the education. I understand your point of view and I'll reflect on my position after researching a bit more, myself. Thank you for the effort you've put into explaining this. --Ds13 (talk) 02:31, 17 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Saeki Ramos CD.jpg listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Saeki Ramos CD.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. VernoWhitney (talk) 17:59, 1 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Sleepy John Estes Album I Aint Gonna Be Worried No More.jpg listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Sleepy John Estes Album I Aint Gonna Be Worried No More.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. VernoWhitney (talk) 18:00, 1 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Watazumi Doso Rinbo Yondai.jpg listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Watazumi Doso Rinbo Yondai.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. VernoWhitney (talk) 18:01, 1 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Nishimura Koku Kyotaku.jpg listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Nishimura Koku Kyotaku.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. VernoWhitney (talk) 18:01, 1 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Kokū Nishimura

The article Kokū Nishimura has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

There's no evidence that this is notable. See reasons at Wikipedia:Files for deletion/2013 February 1#File:Nishimura Koku Kyotaku.jpg.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Stefan2 (talk) 14:06, 11 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Kyotaku (Kokū Nishimura album)

The article Kyotaku (Kokū Nishimura album) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

There's no evidence that this is notable. See reasons at Wikipedia:Files for deletion/2013 February 1#File:Nishimura Koku Kyotaku.jpg.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Stefan2 (talk) 14:06, 11 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

deaf sicilian

hello, I've an problem: I can not place to my page user ise for Italian Sign Language. what should I do?? --SurdusVII (talk) 18:22, 2 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Books and Bytes: The Wikipedia Library Newsletter

Books and Bytes

Volume 1, Issue 1, October 2013

by The Interior (talk · contribs), Ocaasi (talk · contribs)

Greetings Wikipedia Library members! Welcome to the inaugural edition of Books and Bytes, TWL’s monthly newsletter. We're sending you the first edition of this opt-in newsletter, because you signed up, or applied for a free research account: HighBeam, Credo, Questia, JSTOR, or Cochrane. To receive future updates of Books and Bytes, please add your name to the subscriber's list. There's lots of news this month for the Wikipedia Library, including new accounts, upcoming events, and new ways to get involved...

New positions: Sign up to be a Wikipedia Visiting Scholar, or a Volunteer Wikipedia Librarian

Wikipedia Loves Libraries: Off to a roaring start this fall in the United States: 29 events are planned or have been hosted.

New subscription donations: Cochrane round 2; HighBeam round 8; Questia round 4... Can we partner with NY Times and Lexis-Nexis??

New ideas: OCLC innovations in the works; VisualEditor Reference Dialog Workshop; a photo contest idea emerges

News from the library world: Wikipedian joins the National Archives full time; the Getty Museum releases 4,500 images; CERN goes CC-BY

Announcing WikiProject Open: WikiProject Open kicked off in October, with several brainstorming and co-working sessions

New ways to get involved: Visiting scholar requirements; subject guides; room for library expansion and exploration

Read the full newsletter

Thanks for reading! All future newsletters will be opt-in only. Have an item for the next issue? Leave a note for the editor on the Suggestions page. --The Interior 21:02, 27 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Kyotaku for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Kyotaku is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kyotaku until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Stefan2 (talk) 13:38, 2 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The Wikipedia Library Survey

As a subscriber to one of The Wikipedia Library's programs, we'd like to hear your thoughts about future donations and project activities in this brief survey. Thanks and cheers, Ocaasi^{t | c} 15:24, 9 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Nishimura Koku Kyotaku.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Nishimura Koku Kyotaku.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 14:34, 17 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Credo

Hello! You have received preliminary approval for access to Credo. Please fill out this short form so that your access can be processed. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:50, 16 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:14, 30 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of FreeHEP

The article FreeHEP has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unrefrenced, not notable

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Kkmurray (talk) 02:01, 21 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Ds13. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page.

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Ds13. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Just van Rossum

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Just van Rossum, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Light2021 (talk) 15:23, 6 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Just van Rossum for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Just van Rossum is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Just van Rossum until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Light2021 (talk) 15:43, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Computer Go Ladder

The article Computer Go Ladder has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable Go server, largely inactive since 2008 per this posting.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 09:54, 28 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Portable Forth Environment

The article Portable Forth Environment has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

The coverage (references, external links, etc.) does not seem sufficient to justify this article passing Wikipedia:General notability guideline and the more detailed Wikipedia:Notability (software) requirement. If you disagree and deprod this, please explain how it meets them on the talk page here in the form of "This article meets criteria A and B because..." and ping me back through WP:ECHO or by leaving a note at User talk:Piotrus. Thank you.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 10:25, 22 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Deaf Equipment Acquisition Fund

The article Deaf Equipment Acquisition Fund has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

[2] and [3] are procedural documents which don't convey notability per WP:NORG. No news coverage appears to exist and the only scholarly pieces on it are almost entirely Wikipedia clones ([4], [5], [6]).

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. StraussInTheHouse (talk) 12:38, 10 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Cdrdao for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Cdrdao is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cdrdao until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Deltaspace⁴² (talk • contribs) 14:49, 22 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]