Talk:Current teachings of Prem Rawat
Appearance
This article was nominated for deletion on 5 April 2006. The result of the discussion was keep. |
Merge
[edit]Unless there are any objections, I will summarize this article into one section and merge it onto Prem Rawat ≈ jossi ≈ t • @ 00:39, 15 May 2006 (UTC)
- I think it is a bit strange: I thought that you held the opinion that Prem Rawat was too big. Andries 00:43, 15 May 2006 (UTC)
- Once the Prem Rawat article becomes 50K or so, it would be OK to add one short section on the current teachings. I am trying to respond to suggestions by editors to keep articles abot Prem Rawat, short and to remove extra articles that are not needed on their own. Less is more, and will avoid constant edit warring, and hopefully we will reach a point in which we can stop editing these articles. It has been long enough, don't you think? ≈ jossi ≈ t • @ 00:50, 15 May 2006 (UTC)
- Does this mean that this article will be redirected to Prem Rawat? I would support that, because the many articles give a maintainability problem. An example of the maintainability problem is the article Past teachings of Prem Rawat that was in a disastrous state for years and is still bad. Andries 00:59, 15 May 2006 (UTC)
- Yes. That is the idea. I am also proposing to merge whatever sourced , non-suplicated material from whatever is left of Past teachings of Prem Rawat onto Divine Light Mission. Hoefully, having concise articles will bring the articles to a stable state. ≈ jossi ≈ t • @ 01:08, 15 May 2006 (UTC)
- We need a central place where we can discuss what articles we need and where we write what. I propose we do it at Category_talk:Prem_Rawat Andries 01:13, 15 May 2006 (UTC)
- Don't think that this is needed. I intend to do as proposed above. If you have any objections, please state it here. ≈ jossi ≈ t • @ 01:55, 15 May 2006 (UTC)
- Yes. That is the idea. I am also proposing to merge whatever sourced , non-suplicated material from whatever is left of Past teachings of Prem Rawat onto Divine Light Mission. Hoefully, having concise articles will bring the articles to a stable state. ≈ jossi ≈ t • @ 01:08, 15 May 2006 (UTC)