Talk:Open-mid central rounded vowel

	Linguistics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Linguistics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of linguistics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LinguisticsWikipedia:WikiProject LinguisticsTemplate:WikiProject LinguisticsLinguistics articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by Phonetics Task Force.

the link to the sound sample points back to the page, instead of a .wav-file

X SAMPA?

What is the X-SAMPA of this vowel? The article wrongly states that it's 3 but 3 is actually the unrounded version.65.102.39.177 19:58, 12 March 2007 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 65.102.39.177 (talk • contribs) [reply]

No, it says the X-Sampa is 3\. The slash makes all the difference. Æµ§œš¹ _{[aɪm ˈfɻɛ̃ⁿdˡi]} 05:06, 13 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

ɞ and ɔ̈ are the same?

I don't about anyone else, but to me [ɞ] and [ɔ̈] are not the same. [ɔ̈] would represent a phone somewhere in between [ɞ] and [ɔ]. If [ɞ] and [ɔ̈] were the same phone, what would be the purpose of diacritics?

Accentman (talk) 09:41, 16 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

<ɞ> is a fairly new symbol, so works that are a little older tended to represent that sound with <ɔ̈>. Nowadays, it's less likely that they would represent the same sound, though I wouldn't be completely surprised if it still happened. — Æµ§œš¹ _{[ãːɱ ˈfɹ̠ˤʷɪ̃ə̃nlɪ]} 13:53, 16 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

It just seems a bit like OR to me, which I thought was a no-no here.

Accentman (talk) 10:50, 19 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I suppose it technically is, though it's a pretty minor issue that many experts would agree on. — Æµ§œš¹ _{[ãːɱ ˈfɹ̠ˤʷɪ̃ə̃nlɪ]} 14:26, 19 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Sound

Is there any recording of this vowel? Where might one find an example of it? — Knyȝt (talk) 10:03, 28 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Yes there is, and it should have been included in the infobox automatically. I can't figure out why that didn't happen, but I've added it manually now. JudahH (talk) 23:25, 27 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]