Talk:Sly Cooper
Sly Cooper (character) was nominated for deletion. The discussion was closed on 27 January 2024 with a consensus to merge. Its contents were merged into Sly Cooper. The original page is now a redirect to this page. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected article, please see its history; for its talk page, see here. |
The following references may be useful when improving this article in the future: |
Merge 'Future' and 'Sly 4' sections?
[edit]Should the "Sly 4" and "Future" sections be merged into just "Sly 4"? They contain almost all the same information. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.142.166.27 (talk) 20:20, 13 December 2010 (UTC)
- Yes. I don't know who thought it was a good idea to have the same thing in two places. Blake (Talk·Edits) 20:24, 13 December 2010 (UTC)
- I think it's because it was written up before the information for Sly 4 was available and no one bothered to merge and/or delete things after said information became available. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.142.166.27 (talk) 05:23, 15 December 2010 (UTC)
The Sly Collection
[edit]Should The Sly Collection have its own article? Ratchet & Clank Collection does. Alphius (talk) 17:04, 1 May 2013 (UTC)
- R&C probably shouldn't, based on the state of the current article, per WP:N. --Izno (talk) 17:05, 1 May 2013 (UTC)
- WP:VG has a specific section relating to remakes. - X201 (talk) 07:51, 2 May 2013 (UTC)
Proposed merge with Sly Cooper Movie
[edit]The movie is said to be released in 2016. Too early for an independent page. Bisswajit 15:10, 28 January 2014 (UTC)
- I'm going to be bold and just redirect it already. No need to discuss something this obvious. --MASEM (t) 15:50, 28 January 2014 (UTC)
- Agreed. While I don't think the release date/year should be a factor in deciding whether an independent page is deserved, I do think that there's simply not enough information yet to justify one. The Ratchet movie had enough to at least build a small start-class article, but there's still very little that's public knowledge about this one. For now, I suggest we keep the redirect and put whatever we find out for certain in the "Film" section until there's enough to justify a split. -- 136.181.195.25 (talk) 15:57, 28 January 2014 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 4 external links on Sly Cooper. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20071106062247/http://ps2.gamezone.com/news/09_11_03_08_05AM.htm to http://ps2.gamezone.com/news/09_11_03_08_05AM.htm
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130215215230/http://uk.gamespot.com/sly-cooper-thieves-in-time/reviews/sly-cooper-thieves-in-time-review-6403394/ to http://uk.gamespot.com/sly-cooper-thieves-in-time/reviews/sly-cooper-thieves-in-time-review-6403394/
- Added
{{dead link}}
tag to http://www.rainmaker.com/?%2Fsite%2Fnews_archives%2F2014%2F86 - Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140730030540/http://www.hypable.com/2014/01/29/sly-cooper-movie-confirmed/ to http://www.hypable.com/2014/01/29/sly-cooper-movie-confirmed/
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20160326200552/http://www.sanzaru.com/ to http://sanzaru.com/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:38, 13 January 2018 (UTC)
Semi-protected edit request on 31 May 2021
[edit]This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Change Eurpoe to Europe in the following paragraph.
Sly Cooper and the Thievius Raccoonus
[edit]Sly Cooper and the Thievius Raccoonus, known as Sly Raccoon in Eurpoe, was released in 2002 for the PlayStation 2. 89.212.238.78 (talk) 08:11, 31 May 2021 (UTC)
"Jump and press the circle button" listed at Redirects for discussion
[edit]The redirect Jump and press the circle button has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 October 4 § Jump and press the circle button until a consensus is reached. Utopes (talk / cont) 03:41, 4 October 2023 (UTC)
"Sly 5: Master Of Thieves" listed at Redirects for discussion
[edit]The redirect Sly 5: Master Of Thieves has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 October 4 § Sly 5: Master Of Thieves until a consensus is reached. Regards, SONIC678 05:17, 4 October 2023 (UTC)
Marika
[edit]Sly Cooper Thieves in Time 4 2A02:1406:69:6706:6558:4F17:7E7C:C97A (talk) 18:28, 23 November 2023 (UTC)
- I'm sorry, but what is the point of this entry? Captain Seasick (talk) 22:20, 12 June 2024 (UTC)
Remove the "other titles" sub-section?
[edit]The aforementioned sub-section in the Games section seems pretty redundant. Maybe it should be removed to trim the article somewhat? I mean, I can't imagine a sub-section that's only 7 words long can add anything of value to the article. What do you others think? Captain Seasick (talk) 22:23, 12 June 2024 (UTC)
Agreed. removed the Main/other section.Blue Pumpkin Pie (talk) 14:09, 13 June 2024 (UTC)