Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Once upon a time...
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was keep. Sjakkalle 11:38, 26 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Wikipedia is not a forum for creative fiction. This is a neat idea community-building, de-stressing idea, but that can and should happen on a fun-and-games WikiCity. The Wikipedia: namespace is intended for instructions, advice, policy, and related discussions. Unrelated items simply become clutter here. -- Beland 02:57, 19 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep, community-building is a major goal of the wikipedia namespace. --Gmaxwell 03:45, 19 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep, per what Gmaxwell said. Linuxbeak | Desk 04:08, May 19, 2005 (UTC)
- Keep, nominator hasn't given a reason to delete. Demi T/C 04:11, 2005 May 19 (UTC)
- Keep. This is part of WP:FUN, part of the community-building programs at Wikipedia. Beland, if you have an issue with this, please contribute to the relative talk pages, not VFD. Zzyzx11 (Talk) 04:51, 19 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- I respectfully dissent with the above. Delete, I don't see how this advances encyclopedia-writing. Gazpacho 05:09, 19 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Move to userspace. →Iñgōlemo← talk 05:46, 2005 May 19 (UTC)
- Move to userspace lest this create a precedent for open-editing WP:NOR-ish projects. Great idea though, don't get me wrong about that. Master Thief Garrett 06:51, 19 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Doesn't this want to be a separate Wiki of its own ? --Simon Cursitor 07:40, 19 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. From the top of the Community Portal - "Together we are building an encyclopedia and a wiki community." --the wub (talk) 08:19, 19 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. its not encyclopedic, but it is in the wikipedia namespace so it's ok. could be really interesting. Bluemoose 16:16, 19 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete I would have voted keep but nothing appears to be happening at the moment. For that reason delete, but should someone else set this up again it should be kept. T.A Stevenson 16:25, 19 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Userfy. RickK 21:19, May 19, 2005 (UTC)
- Keep, see Category:Wikipedia games.
- Transwiki to Wikicities or Meta. — Phil Welch 03:20, 20 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. Community-building project. And as far as the Wikipedia: namespace being only for policy-type things and related discussions, what about WP:BJAODN? Hermione1980 14:45, 20 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep of course - Belan lighten up! Brookie: A collector of little brown things 20:11, 20 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.