Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Braden mailloux
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was deleted already. Mindspillage (spill yours?) 15:15, 14 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Vanity, non-notable. Google returns wikipedia mirrors and the other results which don't seem to be related. Delete. —Markaci 2005-05-6 T 23:21 Z
- Delete, vanity. ~~Shiri — Talk~~ 00:07, May 7, 2005 (UTC)
- Redirect to "Mailbox" because that's what I thought the second word was, and I can't fathom anyone looking for this page anyway. --BDD 00:23, 7 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Bad suggestion. Regardless of the merits of this particular article, "Mailloux" is a real surname. Bearcat 08:50, 8 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Uh... certainly don't redirect. On the claim to have been the "been the subject, protagonist, and antagonist in numerous indepedent films," no personnel or character named Braden Mailloux on IMDB. If he's "the star of a plethora of flash cartoons and games by many artists nationwide" one of about 16 google hits might mention it. Delete. Samaritan 00:45, 7 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, a redirect as suggested would be ludicrous. RickK 05:22, May 7, 2005 (UTC)
- Delete; I'm surprised this wasn't speedied, actually. List of nicknames? Star of Flash cartoons? Weaknesses include potato pellets? I think that's speedyable. Bearcat 08:50, 8 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Humor --BDD 17:40, 8 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- I think maybe you missed the part about humour actually invoking amusement in other people... Bearcat 18:14, 8 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- (Invalid anon vote) Keep Hi I'm completely new to Wikipedia, however I came across this entry by legitimately searching from Google for this series of Flash cartoons. I know of the cartoon character and found the biographical stuff really interesting. I guess some of the entry isn't serious, but I think the article as a whole is useful. 2005-05-10 T 23:51 Z
- Delete - vanity - Tεxτurε 16:52, 11 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.