Talk:Fingerprint

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Fingerprint article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: 1, 2: 3 months

Law Enforcement Low‑importance

	Law portal This article is within the scope of the WikiProject Law Enforcement. Please Join, Create, and Assess.Law EnforcementWikipedia:WikiProject Law EnforcementTemplate:WikiProject Law EnforcementLaw enforcement
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

Anatomy: Gross Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Anatomy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Anatomy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AnatomyWikipedia:WikiProject AnatomyTemplate:WikiProject AnatomyAnatomy
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article has been classified as relating to gross anatomy.

Guild of Copy Editors

This article was copy edited by a member of the Guild of Copy Editors.Guild of Copy EditorsWikipedia:WikiProject Guild of Copy EditorsTemplate:WikiProject Guild of Copy EditorsGuild of Copy Editors

Tip: Anchors are case-sensitive in most browsers.

This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.

[[Dermatoglyphics#:~:text=Dermatoglyphics (from Ancient Greek derma,superficially similar pseudoscience of palmistry.|dermatoglyphic]]

Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. | Reporting errors

Reference of Fingerprint in the Holy Quran

Fingerprints are unique to each individual. We all have fingerprints however they are unique. Even identical twins have different fingerprints. However nobody knew this 1400 years ago. But it was mentioned in the Quran that on Resurrection Day Allah will recreate humans with all details even their fingertips. Today we know that those contain fingerprints which are unique to each individual.

Quran: 75.4 Yes indeed; We are Able to reconstruct his fingertips.

Direct link to the verse

On Resurrection Day Allah will reconstruct our bodies to the smallest detail even our unique fingerprints. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Yusuf.islam.al (talk • contribs) 04:00, 28 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Didier NIYITANGA 197.157.184.12 (talk) 18:59, 22 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Classification systems

The part of this section beginning with "The system used by most experts" is very confusing. There are two mathematical formula, which do not match each other ( ${\frac {a}{b}}+{\frac {c}{d}}$ does not equal ${\frac {a+c}{b+d}}$ ) and there's an additional 1 added in the calculation that isn't part of either stated formula. It seems, from Henry Classification System, that the quantity is usually not reduced: you can have the fraction 32/32 and that's not written as 1/1, nor as 1. This part also isn't cited, which makes it hard to determine what was intended. -Apocheir (talk) 23:28, 25 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I've rewritten this portion to make it more straightforward -- including an explicit formula -- with attention to the point about not reducing the fraction. (I also removed the maintenance tag.) — r.e.s. (talk) 18:56, 1 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 7 May 2024

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

Typo in text. "Fringerprint" as opposed to "Fingerprint". Additional r after F. Camicarva (talk) 19:35, 7 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Done Many thanks. Martinevans123 (talk) 19:44, 7 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

😃HANIA 139.135.38.179 (talk) 14:51, 2 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Trouble sourcing a claim

Hello! I recently noticed that all claims citing the existence of 'The Volume of Crime Scene Investigation—Burglary (Qin Dynasty)' wherein the authors make the claim of palm and finger printing being used in the Qin Dynasty come from a single 7 page article:

Xiang-Xin, Z.; Chun-Ge, L. The Historical Application of Hand Prints in Chinese Litigation. J. Forensic Ident. 1988, 38 (6), 277–284.

I was curious as a Chinese Historian as I had never heard of this primary source before - and given the limited primary sources about the Qin dynasty I wanted to investigate. Every source I have been able to find making this claim always cite this single source (or like the citation in this article, cite someone who cites this source) and never the primary source directly. I can not find a copy of the journal article to verify the claim (though https://archive.org/details/sim_journal-of-forensic-identification_1988-1997_38-47_cumulative-index/page/668/mode/2up shows it does indeed appear in that journal). I'm not prepared to spend money to try and verify the claim and wanted to know if someone more familiar with this journal could take a look and make sure this is a reliable claim and not just a case of circular citation off-discipline. Relm (talk) 20:04, 5 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 31 October 2024

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

Text in bold links to the article itself, change link to fingerprint scanner or remove.

"Since 2000, electronic fingerprint readers have been introduced as consumer electronics security applications. Fingerprint sensors could be used for login authentication and the identification of computer users."

(Under "Consumer electronics login authentication" of "Fingerprint sensors") Cosmiroq (talk) 00:41, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Done FifthFive (talk) 01:34, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

History of devices with fingerprint

Hi,

Numerous devices have had fingerprint sensors of various types, including many phones.

As usual, a big part of the article, more than a paragraph, is about Apple's fingerprint scanner, which was not an innovation, nor unique, nor anything worth mentioning. Or a paragraph on each and every manufacturer using some similar verification method should be listed.

It is time to stop the "Apple paragraph" on everything Apple may use even 15 years later, or the so many things they did not even design... Or when they are 20 years late: OLED screens, there is a paragraph about Apple. Why? Except to say that they were terribly late? To show how average their devices are?

The technology pages on Wikipedia are sometimes entirely manipulated, from the GUI page that only shows Linux GUI (none of them have any interest...; in fact, there should not even be one) and so many pages where Microsoft is not mentioned, when they were a major actor... meaning almost all pages, whether the GNU extremists or Apple adepts agree or not.

There is history and truth, and then there are fallacies. Let's write about tamed unicorns over the ages. The major role of GNU Hurd in the renaissance... or just The Day Hurd Booted. Great article. 78.129.97.160 (talk) 01:35, 15 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]