Delete: If copyvio, then handle it that way. If not, this is borderline original research. It is an essay, so, whether it's citation stuff or not, it's a plea to readers to change to student-centered learning. BTW, I've done "student centered learning," and neither I nor the students were very fond of it. ("You're the expert, so why aren't you going to tell us what you know?") Geogre 02:21, 13 Sep 2004 (UTC)
Delete. Even if not copyvio, it has an agenda, so it is POV. Not one graf in the article is free of a POV sentence. - KeithTyler 19:14, Sep 15, 2004 (UTC)
This is an attempt to explain Malcolm Knowles' theory of adult learning which he called "Andragogy". His work dates back to 1978 so it can't exactly be called a neologism anymore. Since it's an attempt to explain a noted researcher's theory (which has been independently published and discussed enough to be notable), it's not really original research either. See, for example, [[1]] or[[2]]. If it survives the copyright investigation, keep and send to cleanup. Rossami 04:05, 16 Sep 2004 (UTC)
Copyvio with [3] and reinforced by [4] (PDF, see page 10) dated 1996. It may have been contributed by the author, but I doubt it; the author would presumably have more to say on the topic. - KeithTyler 17:58, Sep 16, 2004 (UTC)
Yeah, I found it too, so I've deleted the text and slapped {{copyvio2}} on it. Bishonen 18:09, 16 Sep 2004 (UTC)
