Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Takano, Yayori

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. --Michael Snow 05:32, 7 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Takano, Yayori

Unverifiable. This page apparently was nominated for vfd back in February 2004 with no consensus; it has had an Accuracy Disputed notice on it since then, but has not been edited. A Google search (without quotation marks, given the inherent ambiguity caused by Japanese name-order being reversed in many Western sources) turns up many Wikipedia mirrors but nothing else to indicate that there is a "superstar" of this name. Russ Blau (talk) 15:10, May 23, 2005 (UTC)

Delete as hoax. Obvious by the lack of stating what Yayori is notable for. Hedley 15:55, 23 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. No non-wiki google hits besides amateur track results. Angela's previous listing for deletion which edited out "She hates Kendall ALOT" and the fact that this is User:StupidFubi's only contributions make it almost certainly vanity and a hoax. DoubleBlue (Talk) 19:23, 23 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, hoax. Megan1967 05:33, 24 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Move to Takano Yayoi (in kanji: 高野弥生). 40,000 hits for kanji (although I have no idea how many are for her). Site in German too. But I admit there's not much content to the article... Fg2 10:19, May 24, 2005 (UTC)
Delete Xcali 05:15, 27 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Move per Fg2, not a hoax. Kappa 19:22, 28 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Closing comment: 5-2 in favor of deleting, and it's not clear that the destination of the move has any connection to the person intended by the article. The person with a German/English site is not based in Japan and certainly not a superstar; nor are the Google hits all for her. After this review, I conclude those preferring deletion have the better case. --Michael Snow 05:32, 7 Jun 2005 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.