User talk:Rmeier~enwiki
Hello and welcome to Wikipedia! Hope you like it here, and stick around.
Here are some tips to help you get started:
- Try the Tutorial, and feel free to experiment in the test area.
- If you need help, post a question at the Help Desk
- Eventually, you might want to read the Manual of Style and Policies and Guidelines.
- Remember Wikipedia:Neutral point of view
- Explore, be bold in editing pages, and, most importantly, have fun!
Good luck!
P.S. One last helpful hint. To sign your posts like I did above (on talk pages, for example) use the '~' symbol. To insert just your name, type ~~~ (3 tildes), or, to insert your name and timestamp, use ~~~~ (4 tildes).
New EMD articles
[edit]Hey, thanks for creating those articles on various EMD locomotives. As you add more, please take a moment to update Wikipedia:WikiProject_Trains/Todo to reflect the work that you've done (I've noticed a few of the red links there turning blue as you add articles). Also, when you add a new page about a specific locomotive model, add it to the Category:Locomotives. Thanks! slambo 21:11, 24 Oct 2004 (UTC)
Re: Copyrights, Formatting and Infoboxes
[edit]I'll answer your questions as one reply here...
Re: Copyrights. The cc-by-sa-2.0 was the closest match in my first read of Wikipedia:Image copyright tags to what the Creative Commons website said to use after I answered the questions there. I see that there are some noncommercial wiki template tags now listed there as well, so I didn't really have to drop that part of the licence. The photos that I'm uploading here aren't the absolute best photos, but they're good enough to be viewed on the screen and in small formats. So, after reviewing the licenses that I saw with my own goals for the photos, cc-by-sa-2.0 is it.
Re: Formatting and Infoboxes. Yeah, the infobox (Template:Railroad) is a bit big, but it's not really what I consider a final format. I want to play with the box a little more to find a better looking display, but haven't had a chance to do so yet (I'm just back from Trainfest, and only have a few minutes right now; most of my free time the last few weeks has been getting ready for the show). My screen resolution is typically 1024x768, and I don't have any other toolbars on my screen. The way the box and photo are sized now, they take up about 1/3 of the column width, with the text next to them using about 2/3 of the column width. I was trying for an infobox that would come out something like the one on British Rail Class 01 or on one of the state pages like that for Wisconsin.
As to the states listed for CNW, I don't really know enough about the railroad itself to set it at a specific time period. I started with what I found in the article and went from there. Perhaps that part of the infobox could be rephrased to more closely reflect the railroad's territory?
slambo 04:52, Nov 15, 2004 (UTC)
Re: List of US railroads
[edit]Just checked it over and it looks fine now. The only thing obvious to me about it today was that it was missing the International Great Northern in the Fallen Flags section, so I added it there. slambo 11:55, Nov 19, 2004 (UTC)
Apologies again
[edit]I must have stuck the {{vfd}} thingie on your excellent page when in a particularly foul mood. It did strike me as unnecessary at first, but it has already become interesting even to my locomotive-ignorant self. The VfD business is by now almost as embarrassing to me as it must be infuriating to you; as far as I remember I'm not supposed to delete it the VfD notice, but if it's still there fourteen or so hours from now I'll dig around in the howto pages to see if I can legitimately remove it the notice. Or I'll contact a moderator or something.
Our Revenge Is Sweet Department adds: Feel free to slap VfD notices on any two of my pages! -- Hoary 11:09, 2004 Dec 19 (UTC)
- Noticing that the page is still listed at VfD, I've contacted an administrator, suggesting that he should tot up the votes as soon as possible, declare the page saved, and move on. (Of course I know how to remove this material myself, but guess that I shouldn't do so. -- Hoary 04:42, 2004 Dec 20 (UTC)
- Thank you for your kind words. I took a couple of days off to cool off, but I'm fine now.Rmeier 06:05, 21 Dec 2004 (UTC)
cowls and cabs
[edit]I recently wrote up a cab unit page completely forgetting about the distinction between them and cowl units (plus, not noticing that the cowl unit article existed). I was hoping you could give the page a good once-over and fix anything I messed up. I'm more of a modern freight guy anyway and that's the sort of thing I'm bound to make mistakes on. Thanks. Ckape 07:15, 3 Jan 2005 (UTC)
- Ooops. I've been off-line for a while. Give me a few days, and then look at carbody unit and cab unit. I've been thinking about creating “carbody unit” for several weeks now. The link for cab unit has been around for a while, long before you actually created the article, and I wanted to point out that “cab unit” refers only to A units, whereas “carbody unit” refers to both A units and B units.
- On the other hand, both cab unit and carbody unit are accepted phrases, and both refer to units where the sides and roofs are structural supports for the entire unit. Therefore, I didn't just want to delete references to cab unit.
- After I've added my thoughts to both articles, we can decide whether to keep the articles separate, or merge them. We could even seek comments from more people. Rmeier 03:42, 10 Jan 2005 (UTC)
- Since "cab unit" and "carbody unit" are so closely related, I decided to make them one article. Rmeier 06:42, 19 Jan 2005 (UTC)
Re: Fairbanks-Morse
[edit]Page FM-344 of The Second Diesel Spotter's Guide (complete reference in the list page) lists CFA16-4 and CFB16-4, and photos of PRR and NYC units are at [1]. The same site has photos of CPA24-5 units from LIRR, NH, NYC and the FM demonstrator; [2] and [3] both list CFA24-5 (although they list them as CFA-24-5). slambo 11:28, Jan 10, 2005 (UTC)
Your account will be renamed
[edit]Hello,
The developer team at Wikimedia is making some changes to how accounts work, as part of our on-going efforts to provide new and better tools for our users like cross-wiki notifications. These changes will mean you have the same account name everywhere. This will let us give you new features that will help you edit and discuss better, and allow more flexible user permissions for tools. One of the side-effects of this is that user accounts will now have to be unique across all 900 Wikimedia wikis. See the announcement for more information.
Unfortunately, your account clashes with another account also called Rmeier. To make sure that both of you can use all Wikimedia projects in future, we have reserved the name Rmeier~enwiki that only you will have. If you like it, you don't have to do anything. If you do not like it, you can pick out a different name. If you think you might own all of the accounts with this name and this message is in error, please visit Special:MergeAccount to check and attach all of your accounts to prevent them from being renamed.
Your account will still work as before, and you will be credited for all your edits made so far, but you will have to use the new account name when you log in.
Sorry for the inconvenience.
Yours,
Keegan Peterzell
Community Liaison, Wikimedia Foundation
02:42, 20 March 2015 (UTC)
Renamed
[edit]This account has been renamed as part of single-user login finalisation. If you own this account you can log in using your previous username and password for more information. If you do not like this account's new name, you can choose your own using this form after logging in: Special:GlobalRenameRequest. -- Keegan (WMF) (talk)
18:10, 22 April 2015 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:52, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
The article Tourist Railway Association, Inc. has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
No credible claim to any significance, I cannot find anything besides Wikipedia mirrors online.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Trainsandotherthings (talk) 22:34, 16 May 2023 (UTC)