Talk:Jeolla Province

Korea Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Korea, a collaborative effort to build and improve articles related to Korea. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how use this banner, please refer to the documentation.KoreaWikipedia:WikiProject KoreaTemplate:WikiProject KoreaKorea-related articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by one or more inactive working groups.

Past tense

“Jeolla was located in …” – what? Isn't it there anymore?

Except for the Culture section near the bottom, this article uses the past. I think most people say “전라도” instead of “호남” or even “서남부 지방” when they talk about this area (not as an administrative entity), and this article should reflect that usage. The same problem perhaps affects similar articles.

Uninformed people who follow a link in, for example, the People's Republic of Korea article will be surprised to learn that its units were active in a province of the Joseon dynasty. If you insist that 전라도 is a thing of the past, we'd have to change a few links from Jeolla to Honam to avoid anachronisms, although I think we should go with the term people use. Wikipeditor 01:00, 24 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Wave of Ilbe-style vandalism in several South Korea-related pages

In the last few days there have been several articles vandalized with claims that Jeolla and Gwangju are pro-North and that pro-democracy protestors were traitors to South Korea. This is in line with typical trolling from Ilbe, which is like the Korean 4chan. Please revert any changes like this, and be extremely cautious of any claims of "pro-North" activity or "rioting" in South Korea. Kondratev (talk) 12:00, 1 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Jeolla Province. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20040903042549/http://seoul600.visitseoul.net/seoul-history/sidaesa/txt/5-3-2-1.html to http://seoul600.visitseoul.net/seoul-history/sidaesa/txt/5-3-2-1.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:16, 21 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Racist attitudes against this region

Could the racist attitudes against this region from South Koreans be mentioned/explained in the article?--Adûnâi (talk) 17:26, 17 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]