Jump to content

Talk:Varg Vikernes

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Is the article too long?

[edit]

Is this individual really important enough to warrant such an in-depth article? Is Wikipedia an encyclopedia or this guy's publicist? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 109.65.42.219 (talk) 19:40, 20 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I entirely agree. It's bloated and too detailed.--Quisqualis (talk) 06:07, 22 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

That doesn’t make a lot of sense. A Wikipedia article being detailed is a good thing, not mattering who its about. As long as the article remains unbiased, I see no problem with its size or detail. Nate Keller (talk) 12:15, 16 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

RfC about self-published works

[edit]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


Should the "Bibliography" section on Varg Vikernes include self-published works, or does that infringe on WP:PROMOTIONAL/WP:SPS? ili (talk) 01:14, 10 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Survey

[edit]
  • Include all works Does not infringe on WP:SPS, per WP:ABOUTSELF, and WP:PROMO is never a valid reason to omit self-published or self-released material from lists of works. Omitting these entries misleads the reader into believing the subject's output is less than it actually is. Lists of works are exactly the sort of thing that an encyclopedia is expected to be comprehensive about. ili (talk) 01:14, 10 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Not sure - summoned by feedback request service. How long a list are we talking about? If it's a handful, and they are notable enough to have gotten media coverage, then it seems OK. If it's dozens of items, perhaps include them but collapse the list so it doesn't take over the article. See what I did here Michael Tobias#Selected works I'd have to see the end result to give a better answer. TimTempleton (talk) (cont) 23:47, 11 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Probably include As far as just an unbiased listing of written works, WP:PROMO is only a consideration if these works do not meet notability standards, but it seems like a handful of the sources in this article do mention his writings on paganism, politics, and roleplaying games so even that would be a tricky case to make. Oeqtte[t] 01:53, 12 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Yes. That's what bibliographies are for. Mariolovr (talk) 02:19, 18 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Yes, it should include all important works by Vikernes. Binksternet (talk) 02:33, 18 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Varg Vikernes the Rapper?

[edit]

All these years he was living a lie. Varg is capable of spitting hot fire all this time. Petercage9 (talk) 05:49, 2 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ummmm..... source????? 188.30.78.71 (talk) 14:48, 24 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

why do my edits keep getting reversed

[edit]

I edited the opening paragraph to mention his ambient and dungeon synth work and it was removed 2A00:23C6:B682:F301:98F4:E058:6A2E:60CF (talk) 02:07, 15 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Source on varg being called Louis Cachet?

[edit]

Yes, he is married to Marie Cachet, but what about the source?

When was he ever called this? Anyone Ven3u69 (talk) 14:57, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Ven3u69, ref [129] translated into English using Google translate says According to the national register, his new name is "Louis Cachet".
As to why it is the bold leading name at the start of the article I am not sure. MOS:FULLNAME may apply. Commander Keane (talk) 01:03, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]