Talk:Cyberport
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
 | The contents of the Bel-Air Residence page were merged into Cyberport on October 2011. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected page, please see its history; for the discussion at that location, see its talk page. |
 | Potential Conflict of Interest This host, {{{1}}}, is registered to Cyberport Hong Kong. Users at this address may have a conflict of interest with editing Wikipedia articles related to their organization. Editors should be especially attentive to possible neutral point of view issues with this user's contributions. |
 | The following Wikipedia contributor may be personally or professionally connected to the subject of this article. Relevant policies and guidelines may include conflict of interest, autobiography, and neutral point of view.
|
Untitled
[edit]I do not see the point of such a detailed transportation schedule: olivier 07:04, 11 Oct 2003 (UTC)
- Where is the "encyclopedic value"?
- this will be difficult to keep up to date over time
- The project seems to be controversial and this is not reflected well in the article. I am not going to do any edit because all the info i have are from blogs, bit this link highlights where i am going [1]
I doubt that the existing information is exclusively from PCCW. Cyberport, after all, is one of the most important political scandals since hong kong was handed over in 1997. The controversy was overwhelming. How could this important information complelely omitted? Yau
This page mostly reads like it was copied from PR materials from PCCW and the Cyberport management. Anyone who has been to Cyberport would know that it is mostly a residential development in the middle of nowhere, with a dead shopping mall. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 116.48.68.187 (talk) 04:12, 5 April 2008 (UTC)
Stop the talking. If anyone want to add info, just throw in a section call "contraversion","political abuse", "scandal" or whatever topic you like. Do remember to point the source of your facts. --60.53.53.61 (talk) 04:16, 10 June 2009 (UTC)
Untitled 2
[edit]I personally think that the area of Cyberport should also be discussed. The school and the Residential Area should not be omitted.
Rrayme (talk) 13:14, 17 May 2010 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Cyberport. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20071122134958/http://www.thestandard.com.hk/news_detail.asp?pp_cat=&art_id=25641&sid=&con_type=1&d_str=19990321&sear_year=1999 to http://www.thestandard.com.hk/news_detail.asp?pp_cat=&art_id=25641&sid=&con_type=1&d_str=19990321&sear_year=1999
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:48, 9 December 2017 (UTC)