Talk:Bella Vista, Arkansas

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Arkansas portal This article is supported by WikiProject Arkansas (assessed as Mid-importance).

Cities

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cities, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of cities, towns and various other settlements on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CitiesWikipedia:WikiProject CitiesTemplate:WikiProject CitiesWikiProject Cities articles

Untitled

Wondering how to edit this U.S. City Entry?
The WikiProject U.S. Cities standards might help.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Rambot (talk • contribs) 02:45, 28 July 2003 (UTC)[reply]

Was this copied from a promotional brochure or something?

Although as far as I can tell this article hasn't been copied from another website, the rather non-neutral language used ("beautiful mountains", "award-winning golf courses" etc etc etc) in most of it makes it sound like it was written as an advertisement. The bulk of this article and its flowery text seem to have been added in huge swaths by one or two people, so it might be wise for somebody to proofread the entire thing and make it sound more factual and less like we're being pitched a timeshare. 4.226.111.233 01:34, 29 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

No this was not copied from brochure. It is actually a work by a few people that have gathered info, both positive and negative, over the last year. The pictures I took myself and donated them to wikipedia. If you want to dispute something, feel free to change it and add your source. Until then lighten up on the criticism. The truth is that this is a "gorgeous" and "award-winning" golf and recreational village. 70.178.120.190 17:32, 2 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The term "award-winning" is indicative of objective and documented fact. The word "gorgeous", however, is rather subjective, as beauty is in the eye of the beholder. Without discrediting the work on the article thus far, it should be noted that the goal for this and other encyclopedia articles is to convey minimal to no opinion. — ArkansasTraveler 19:28, 30 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I have just tried to clean it up a bit, and make it flow better (by moving around pictures and merging useful sections). I'll try to make it sound more neutral; I have removed some text such as a personal story about how someone stole road signs or something or other. It did have a sentence or two that admitted the writer was someone who spent a fond childhood growing up there, which I removed. It needs a lot of references in the 'Growth' section, and I'm not sure I'll have the time to look them all up. I'll do my best to clean it up further. kka rma 21:58, 18 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I've noticed quite a few city articles that have the exact same headings, content, tone, etc, & I was wondering if they all came from brochures myself. This is especially irritating as I'm researching to find places in the Arkansas-Missouri area that were well-established prior to the Civil War, & it seems 4 out of 5 that I hit as likely prospects have absolutely nothing in them regarding their history....incl this one. I don't know how these articles are even considered C-class when one of the most important sections have been omitted. ScarletRibbons (talk) 05:40, 12 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Article Cleanup Co-Ordination Point

Cleanup Co-ordination

This article has recently been tagged as requiring cleanup to meet Wikipedia's quality standards.

The article may have been flagged as needing cleanup because it has been suggested that:

the article needs formatting, proofreading, or rephrasing in comprehensible English.
the article has multiple overlapping problems.
the article is very short and might need expanding, removal or merging with a broader article

For a full list of possible problems see Wikipedia:Manual of Style.

As part of the cleanup process, the automated bot PocKleanBot has generated this notice as a focus of cleanup efforts, and also contacted several contributing editors of the article to bring their attention to the problem. You should use this section to discuss possible resolution of the problem and achieve consensus for action. Only when there is a consensus that the article is now cleaned up should you then de-list it by deleting the cleanup tag from the article, this causes the article to drop off the monthly cleanup-needed list page.

Discussion

This article needs some work, but it looks pretty good as class "C"s go on the projects list. Contributors have obviously put some work into this. No inaccuracies jumped up with my first read (and I can check some things), and the photos are nice. I live in Rogers BTW and I am very familiar with Bella Vista. I will see if I can help with this as well.--Traveler7 (talk) 21:11, 12 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Cooper

Who the hell is "Cooper?" — Preceding unsigned comment added by 207.38.246.94 (talk) 20:09, 4 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

A major developer of the community according to this version. That paragraph needs to be clarified. --NeilN ^{talk to me} 20:43, 4 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 6 external links on Bella Vista, Arkansas. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:45, 30 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]