User talk:Audentis

{{AMA alerts}}

Please feel free to add any comments about pages I've created or edited to this page, or to the discussion section of the article itself, if you so choose.

Comments on Pages I've Created/Edited

Feel free to be critical, but be nice!

Requests for Advocacy

Requests are welcome, regardless of the field of knowledge involved. Click here to read my Member Statement on the AMA page.

Thank you Audentis for your response on my talk page and your willingness to help. Here is an important link which validates my claim that Tirat Carmel was developed on the site of the evacuated Palestinian-Arab village of al-Tirah. I've learned a great deal from this external link and I plan to add that information to the article -- once the arbitration process is over and I can be sure that there will be no further tampering with the facts:

http://www.palestineremembered.com/Haifa/al-Tira/index.html

And here is another link, which validates my position on the second point of contention -- that the MATAM industrial park is part of nearby Haifa, and therefore should not be mentioned in an article about Tirat Carmel:

http://www.gav-yam.co.il/GavYam/site/matam/eng/about_us/main.asp

RCSB 08:29, 3 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

WOW! What thorough research!

Thank you Audentis for your immense help. The research you have done and your pains to uphold impartiality are amazing.

As you have noticed, I did revise the article again, the reason being that I merged it with the article on Tirat Karmel (With a 'K') and felt I might as well edit it according to my findings.

This has been my first 'major' work on the Wikipedia and I've learned much of a technical nature. More importantly, however, I've learned from your example what standards one should uphold when contributing to the Wikipedia. RCSB 00:37, 4 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Human Rights Servey on Wikipedia (The final post of I_sterbinski)

Dear all,

Wikipedia was recently a subject of intensive research of an huge international human right organization. A team of people from different nationalities and ages were acting on Wikipedia for 20 days, investigating previously noted anomalities of Wikipedia free editing and forming a final report, which (between the others similar reports) will later be a guide to all future moves of the organization concerning Wikipedia. Acting under an account of a real person, their privacy is to be held private. Therefore, very few private information will be revealed.

Also, this is a result of the lack of final possition of the organization concerning Wikipedia and human rights, which was still not formed.

The team's final post on Wikipedia, where they explain their actions can be found on the following addresses:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:I_sterbinski

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Macedonia#Human_Rights_Servey_on_Wikipedia_.28The_final_post_of_I_sterbinski.29

The team would like to thank to all the persons who took part in the correspondence with us.

We also want to appologise for keeping our identity secret for a longer period.

Best regards,

Aleksandar, Biljana, Asparuh, Christos, Valjon, Michael and Ana Luiza

I sterbinski 01:04, 28 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Template/Workshop

You, or any Wikipedia user, can contribute your suggestions and comments to the /Workshop page of any active arbitration case. Comments on evidence or proposals can help in understanding the import of evidence and in refining proposals. Proposed principles, findings of fact, or remedies may be listed on /Proposed decision and form part of the final decision. Fred Bauder 18:35, 26 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

AMA

Hello, you are receiving this message because your name is on the list of members of the Association of Members' Advocates. There is a poll being held at Wikipedia talk:Association of Members' Advocates for approval of a proposal for the revitalisation of the association. You are eligible to vote and your vote and input are welcome. Izehar 22:15, 6 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

AMA Coordinator Election

Dear AMA Member,

You are entitled to vote in the AMA Coordinator election, set to begin at midnight on 3 February 2006. Please see the pages on the election and its candidates and the procedure and policy and cast a vote by e-mail!

Wally 10:58, 2 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Request for advocacy

Hello, I am an editor on the 2004 U.S. presidential election controversy and irregularities article. Recently a user has voiced a number of complaints about the article, and a number of editors, including myself, have replied. Unfortunately, the discussion between he and I has deteriorated to such an extent that he has taken to ignoring me.[1] I was hoping you might be interested in acting as an advocate for me in this dispute, providing your views on the issue or how it can be resolved, or anything else you think may help before I take the next step and attempt more formal mediation. The details of the dispute are on the article's talk page, starting here. It might also be helpful to look at the article's edit history starting at 2006-05-04 04:11:57 UTC. Thank you. -- noosph e re 00:22, 7 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

AMA Roll Call

There is currently an AMA Roll Call going on. Please visit the page and sign your name to indicate whether or not you're still active. :-) אמר Steve Caruso _(desk/poll) 17:56, 13 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Need help - I feel intimidated by cop who is editor

Hi, I am reaching out to you with an odd situation even for Wikipedia. I attempted to edit the article on John Littlechild 1who led the first Special Irish Branch for the UK police and who also investigated the Jack the Ripper and Oscar Wilde cases. I saw that the article only touched on the career points of the subject. I noted that the formation of the Special Branch was opressive to the Irish and that Littlechild has a homophobe for his prosecution of Wilde.

These edits were promptly removed several times by editor Ben W. Bell 2 - a pro British Irishman. The editor Necrothesp 3 -- who authored the article -- also removed various entries. I even reduced the entry to say that the formation of the Special Branch was oppressive to the Irish and nothing more. This too was removed under the excuse that I was offering a POV and not a neutral objective fact.

I was going to get administrators to act as third parties but became intimidated by one simple fact -- on Necrothesp's user page its states that he is a British cop and a member of the U.K. Territorial army. I could go on forever talking about why the British police should not be allowed to edit articles on Northern Ireland but that would be useless. I travel in the UK a great deal and the police have special powers to trace users of any BBS system.

Necrothesp and Ben W. Bell also kept posting on my talk page after I said I felt intimidated. I asked them nicely to leave unitl after the editing conflict wass resolved but they still kept posting. I feel very intimidated. I would like to revise the article with more solid sources but fear being ganged up on again by Necorthesp the cop and his friend Ben W. Bell. In the last entry he made on my talk page Necorthest suggested I leave Wikipedia altogether which is very intimidating coming from someone who is a policeman 4.

I would still like to edit the article but would like you or some other advocate to watch what is being said and done. Please help!

I look forward to hearing from you.

617USA 617USA 30 July 2006 (UTC)

License tagging for Image:Nicole Corriero.JPG

Thanks for uploading Image:Nicole Corriero.JPG. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 21:09, 28 September 2006 (UTC)

Regarding Association of Members' Advocates

Hi, you are receiving this message because you have listed yourself as an active member of WP:AMA. If you aren't currently accepting inquiries for AMA, or if you have resigned, please de-list yourself from Wikipedia:AMA Members. If you are still active, please consider tending to any new requests that may appear on Category:AMA Requests for Assistance. We're going to put AMA on wheels. :) Sorry for the template spamming - we're just trying to update our records, after we had a huge backlog earlier in the week (if you've been taking cases, then sorry, and please ignore this :)). Again, sorry, and thanks! M a rtinp23 21:14, 22 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:JSLI logo.jpg)

Thanks for uploading File:JSLI logo.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:55, 21 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Using IPs to evade edit limits

Audentis, you should refrain from using IPs to evade edit limits on articles as it appears you are doing at Dario Hunter. @190.8.35.85:, @179.53.72.255:, and @148.255.53.202: have all made the same edits as you have over the last few days. This is a serious violation of Wikipedia's policies. Please refrain from making such edits or you will be reported and possibly blocked from further edits.--User:Namiba 14:37, 29 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I reject your claim. But I observe that on that same article, User:Namiba you have reverted the same things well over the allowed 3 reverts. (5 times.) Please stop edit warring in violation of Wikipedia policy. Audentis (talk) 14:41, 29 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

3 times over 24 hours. Please read WP:3R.--User:Namiba 14:43, 29 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please read the article that you’ve linked to more thoroughly. “Fourth reverts just outside the 24-hour period may also be taken as evidence of edit-warring, especially if repeated or combined with other edit-warring behavior.” Audentis (talk) 14:47, 29 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

“Even without a 3RR violation, an administrator may still act if they believe a user's behavior constitutes edit warring, and any user may report edit warring with or without 3RR being breached.“ Audentis (talk) 14:50, 29 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to report me, go for it. I will be happy to have administrators examine the origins of these mysterious IP edits which all mirror yours.--User:Namiba 15:00, 29 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Done. Check your talk page for notice of the report. Audentis (talk) 15:25, 29 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

August 2020

You have been blocked from editing from certain pages (Dario Hunter) for a period of 72 hours for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Salvio

15:51, 29 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note that I've blocked you as well because, per WP:DUCK, I am confident the IPs were operated by you. Please note that if you do that again the next block will not be partial. $Salvio$ 15:53, 29 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for logging out to continue edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Salvio

16:11, 29 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]