User talk:Khaim

Welcome!

Hello, Khaim, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! Jayjg | (Talk) 21:28, 24 Jan 2005 (UTC)

MTG content

You're new here, and quite enthusiastic on the subject of Magic, but I think you're failing to place things in perspective. Wikipedia is not a Magic encyclopedia, and much of what you've been adding lately is going beyond the scope of this project. I'm speaking especially on the MTG rules article, as well as your additions of Magic reference in some strange places (COP, Tempo). I also think the number of card images you're uploading exceeds fair use.

What you may find interesting is that there is already a wiki devoted to Magic at http://mtgarchive.net/. Perhaps a good place to put more energy into? -- Netoholic @ 21:07, 25 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I'm actually just trying to improve on what's already here. Wikipedia needs a Magic article, correct? And it should have a (brief) explanation of the gameplay and rules. Since it seemed like there was a problem in the gameplay section of the existing article, I was trying to split the section into a main article and a smaller section on the main page.

COP I didn't add. I was bored and fixing links. Tempo and mulligan I have added, but those are both game terms in the first place so I don't see a problem with that. As for images, it's a matter of style. Articles get pretty boring without images. I may have overdone it in places, though. You're welcome to cut them, of course.

And please don't try to get rid of me like that. I'm trying to make these pages into something that is readable by someone who doesn't play the game, and accurately portrays the many facets of Magic. Part of that, or even most of that, is style. Thus the images, thus the rules page. I see no reason why this page can't be featured article. --Khaim 22:31, 25 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

You put a cleanup tag on artificial consciousness article. Why do you think the article needs cleanup, and what are your suggestions? I ask that because you did not explain it anywhere, putting the cleanup tag on that article was all that you have ever written about that article, no other edits, comments or messages. Also it's somewhat strange that you are a new user who only edited articles on Magic and other such card games so far, and the only edit different from these is Artificial Consciousness article. No I don't say that you cannot do that, just somewhat seems that you are not who you say you are, you simply look like too experienced for a new or inexperienced user. Also I cannot avoid saying that your writing style reminds me a lot that of Paul Beardsell, who BTW likes gambling and card games as well, and who is banned from editing Artificial Consciousness article indefinitely by the decision of the Arbitration Committee. I'm not certain that you are a sock puppet of Paul Beardsell, but I inevitably have such suspicion. But the only thing I ask you is to substantiate your edits, so that your reasons would be more clear to others.Tkorrovi 15:29, 23 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

my 2a page

Thanks for your kind words! Tony 08:32, 9 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Media coverage of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict

Why does it need to be wikified, in your opinion? It seems rather strange, considering the article is reasonably well-formatted. -- Ynhockey ^(Talk) 19:09, 29 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I was mostly refering to the intro. It reads like a personal account, not an encyclopedia entry. The section "charges of media bias" is also rather poorly done. I may have added the wrong tag, however. --Khaim 19:54, 29 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Magic: The Gathering rules for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Magic: The Gathering rules is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Magic: The Gathering rules (3rd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. TTN (talk) 23:30, 20 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Khaim. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Magic: The Gathering rules for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Magic: The Gathering rules is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Magic: The Gathering rules (4th nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 18:08, 8 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]