Talk:English cuisine

English cuisine has been listed as one of the Agriculture, food and drink good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Review: January 29, 2016. (Reviewed version).

This article is written in British English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, travelled, centre, defence, artefact, analyse) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.

Food and drink High‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Food and drink, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of food and drink related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Food and drinkWikipedia:WikiProject Food and drinkTemplate:WikiProject Food and drinkFood and drink articles

High

This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Food and Drink task list:

To edit this page, select here

Here are some tasks you can do for WikiProject Food and drink:

Help bring these Top Importance articles currently B Status or below up to GA status: Agaricus bisporus (i.e. mushroom), Beef, Bread, Curry, Drink, Food, Ham and eggs, Soy sauce, Sushi, Yogurt
Bring these Top Importance articles currently at GA status up to FA status: Beer, French cuisine, Sugar
Bring these High Importance articles currently at GA status up to FA status: Apple, Burger King, Fish
Participate in project-related deletion discussions.
Delete unrelated trivia sections found in articles. Please review WP:Trivia and WP:Handling trivia to learn how to do this.
Add the {{WikiProject Food and drink}} project banner to food and drink related articles and content to help bring them to the attention of members. For a complete list of banners for WikiProject Food and drink and its child projects, select here.
Provide photographs and images for Category:Wikipedia requested images of food
Consider joining this project's Assessment task force. List any project ideas in this section

Note: These lists are transcluded from the project's tasks pages.

England High‑importance

	England portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject England, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of England on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnglandWikipedia:WikiProject EnglandTemplate:WikiProject EnglandEngland-related articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Archives

1, 2

This page has archives. Sections older than 90 days may be automatically archived by when more than 3 sections are present.

On pictures of coronation chicken

Something something WP:BRD, though I didn't think it would be controversial to swap this for that. I'm not mad, I'm just disappointed. How can you stand behind the preposterous suggestion that grey mound of sludge is archetypal coronation chicken, a dish noted for its distinct colour?

I agree there are in fact no good pictures of coronation chicken on Wikimedia. Someone should change this. In the meantime though, I support yellow indistinct mound of sludge over white indistinct mound of sludge. It's also worth noting that the picture I changed it to is the one in use on the main Coronation Chicken article. I would like to hear more about your reasoning to the contrary @Chiswick Chap BrigadierG (talk) 21:50, 21 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for discussing. We may need a better picture, or the colour balance may need to be adjusted, or someone forgot the turmeric; but the other picture was worse. If anyone can take a decent one, that'd be great. Chiswick Chap (talk) 02:59, 22 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

In what way was it worse? I'm not sure there are many faults worse than coronation chicken looking grey. Let's try to be objective here. Perhaps a useful question to ask is "which photo would be more useful to a person trying to identify coronation chicken when visiting England" - since that is what Encyclopedias were originally (reference guides). BrigadierG (talk) 19:05, 22 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Neither photo is very good. Sorry, but the awful grey membranes depicted in "Pollo Coronación" and presented on a plate with a too-busy design are unappetizing, to say the least. At least the version buried in yellow sauce looks edible, unlike the other ghastly production. Carlstak (talk) 15:40, 23 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The images are not good, and do not depict a 1953-recipe coronation chicken either. Constance Spry's original recipe called for mayonnaise (naturally yellow), curry powder (which contained chilli, turmeric, and other spices, adding yellow), red wine (yeah, red), and apricots (yeah, orange) but not raisins, which were added in ghastly 1970s versions of the dish. If anyone would care to make the dish properly --- hell, I could make one! --- and photograph it decently, it'd be appreciated. Chiswick Chap (talk) 08:44, 24 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You know what? This is now my god-given mission. I shall create new knowledge untold for future generations. I shall do what 20 years of Wikipedia editors could not.

I shall prepare coronation chicken that doesn't look like shit. BrigadierG (talk) 21:54, 24 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hooray! ;-) Carlstak (talk) 22:12, 24 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Congrats, BrigadierG, you did it. Your new Coronation chicken photo looks infinitely better than the Pollo Coronación version. Personally, I'm not crazy about the viscous yellow sauce (nature of the dish I guess). So how did it taste? That's what really counts. Carlstak (talk) 02:07, 3 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It's among my favourite sandwich fillings (alongside prawn mayo and ham + chutney) and it was bloody lovely as far as I'm concerned. BrigadierG (talk) 08:51, 3 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No accounting for taste ;-} but thank you very much for the work, and the photo. Chiswick Chap (talk) 09:43, 3 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]