Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pajawa
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was delete. ugen64 04:29, 24 Mar 2005 (UTC)
Slang dicdef, at least. Delete. --BM 16:49, 6 Mar 2005 (UTC)
- Delete. Neologism, I couldn't find any google results indicating actual use. Kappa 19:15, 6 Mar 2005 (UTC)
- Speedy delete, orphan silly junk. -- Infrogmation 22:13, 6 Mar 2005 (UTC)
- keep: this is a commonly used word amongst todays youth. keep it - This edit by User:205.244.100.206
- Delete. Even if it is real, and I doubt it, it serves no purpose in an encyclopedia. --Feitclub 02:30, Mar 7, 2005 (UTC)
- Delete. Real or neologism, wikipedia is not a dictionary. JeremyA 02:34, 7 Mar 2005 (UTC)
- Delete, neologism, dictionary defintion. Megan1967 05:05, 7 Mar 2005 (UTC)
- Delete. At best a dicdef. Looks like a neologism. Borders on nonsense. Jonathunder 06:21, 2005 Mar 7 (UTC)
- Delete. Neologism. JFW | T@lk 03:02, 8 Mar 2005 (UTC)
- Delete and delete - David Gerard 10:35, 11 Mar 2005 (UTC)
This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.