User talk:Kvaks

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia! Hope you like it here, and stick around.

Here are some tips to help you get started:

Try the Tutorial, and feel free to experiment in the test area.
If you need help, post a question at the Help Desk
Eventually, you might want to read the Manual of Style and Policies and Guidelines.
Remember Wikipedia:Neutral point of view
Explore, be bold in editing pages, and, most importantly, have fun!

Good luck!

P.S. One last helpful hint. To sign your posts like I did above (on talk pages, for example) use the '~' symbol. To insert just your name, type ~~~ (3 tildes), or, to insert your name and timestamp, use ~~~~ (4 tildes).

Welcoming

Hello. I just saw your message on Meelar's talk page. Meelar is the only human being known to welcome people faster than a bot can. :-) Every change made to any page in Wikipedia shows up on Recent Changes. There are a lot of us who patrol Recent Changes, making sure all of the edits are good. When we see someone whose name is in red, that means they've not written anything on their user page and are probably a new user. We then check to make sure they've been welcomed. Meelar just happens to be very fast at welcoming people. I would like to add my welcome. I hope you enjoy editing here. If you have any questions, you can ask at the help desk or on my talk page. :-) SWAdair | Talk 08:17, 14 Oct 2004 (UTC)

Oops. The link didn't work. I've fixed the link so you can click on Recent Changes now and see what I was talking about. SWAdair | Talk 08:21, 14 Oct 2004 (UTC)

Aw, thanks! [[User:Meelar|Meelar (talk)]] 15:26, Oct 14, 2004 (UTC)

Changing attribution

Yes, that happens fairly frequently. See Wikipedia:Changing attribution for an edit for instructions. SWAdair | Talk 09:09, 14 Oct 2004 (UTC)

Smash Mouth and The Waterboys

Hi. I'd like to get the article on The Waterboys fully referenced, and I notice that you made this edit that included The Waterboys as an influence on Steven Harwell. Do you happen to have a reference for that? It would be very helpful. Thanks. Jkelly 04:10, 17 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I can't remember where I read that, but I know I read it somewhere (I didn't make it up). Hm, google wasn't much help, which makes me wonder (I thought google knew everything...). I'll try to find out where I got it from. -Kvaks 21:38, 17 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

When I made that edit, after reading (somewhere) that Waterboys was one of his influences, I changed "Harwell credits Van Halen, Velvet Revolver, and Elvis Presley as his greatest influences" to "Harwell credits Van Halen, The Waterboys, and Elvis Presley as his greatest influences" thinking that Velvet Revolver is a contemporary band and cannot be a influence on an musician whose career's beginnings predates that band. I now see on the Smash Mouth web site that Harwell lists "Van Halen, Velvet Revolver, and Elvis Presley" as favorite music, not his influence, so I should probably change that whole sentence in the Harwell WP article. I'm still sure that I read somewhere that The Waterboys was an infuence on him (incredible as it may sound), else there's no way I'd have made that edit. - Kvaks 22:05, 17 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

The reason that I asked is because I am doing a lot of work at The Waterboys (perhaps you would care to contribute at peer review?). It's a shame that we can't find a source for it. 02:49, 23 November 2005 (UTC)

Renaming

Can you update some of the links affected by your change of The Bridge (Iain Banks) to The Bridge (novel)? Guinnog 07:21, 28 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Is that really necessary? I updated the only double redirect. Besides, I'm not even sure the move was such a good idea. It depends on the likelyhood of the other novels mentioned on The_Bridge_(disambiguation) getting wikipedia articles (I have no idea how noteworthy they are). It'd be a lot of unnecessary work to change the links if the page is moved back. --Kvaks 12:07, 28 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Not really necessary, no, just arguably good manners. It's a lot of work either way. However, I agree with your move and will not revert it. Guinnog 18:31, 28 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image Tagging Image:Laksevaags Bueskyttere.jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Laksevaags Bueskyttere.jpg. I notice the 'image' page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then there needs to be an argument why we have the right to use the media on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then it needs to be specified where it was found, i.e., in most cases link to the website where it was taken from, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag then one should be added. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media qualifies as fair use, consider reading fair use, and then use a tag such as {{Non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other media, consider checking that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stan 06:00, 19 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned fair use image (Image:Marionravenpressphoto.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Marionravenpressphoto.jpg. I notice the 'image' page currently specifies that the image is unlicensed for use on Wikipedia and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Fritz S. (Talk) 22:16, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Unspecified source for Image:Laksevaags Bueskyttere.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Laksevaags Bueskyttere.jpg. I notice the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this file yourself, then there needs to be a justification explaining why we have the right to use it on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you did not create the file yourself, then you need to specify where it was found, i.e., in most cases link to the website where it was taken from, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the file also doesn't have a copyright tag, then one should be added. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{Non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Nv8200p talk 04:30, 30 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

JD Samson

I reverted your edit to JD Samson because your edit was in uncyclopedic language. If you can think of a way of rewording what you wanted to say which would make it suitable for the article, then please feel free. Perhaps a referenced comment about her being a butch lesbian, rather than just saying that she "looks like a dude". Please message me on my talk page if you have any comments. Dondiasco 11:27, 31 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Mind your comments

This kind of comment adds absolutely nothing to discussions and therefore I removed it. If you want to get your opinion across, I suggest you do it in a civil manner. You could also try to actually add some arguments instead of merely expressing your support or opposition to certain suggestions

Peter ^Isotalo 14:34, 26 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

That is so (fucking) pathetic. ----Kvaks 22:53, 26 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It's easy to be rude when you have anonymity to hind behind, isn't it?

Peter ^Isotalo 12:09, 27 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It's also easy to make certain people go bananas just by applying certain "bad" words that trigger their police mentality and reveal where their priorities are. You have shown your true colours. --Kvaks 15:23, 27 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Farmers Market (band)

The article was deleted because it failed to assert why the band was notable. If you believe you can write an article showing why the band is notable, I will restore the old article in a subpage of yours so that you may work on it until it is ready to go back to the mainspace. If you would like to do this, let me know and I will do it for you. seresin ( ¡? ) 18:27, 1 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, thank you. --Kvaks (talk) 21:02, 1 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I have restored it to User:Kvaks/Farmers Market. Please keep this in mind. If you need any further assistance, feel free to ask. seresin ( ¡? ) 01:05, 2 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Kissa her

Bubba. --Kvaks (talk) 20:32, 20 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Notification: changes to "Mark my edits as minor by default" preference

Hello there. This is an automated message to tell you about the gradual phasing out of the preference entitled "Mark all edits minor by default", which you currently have (or very recently had) enabled.

On 13 March 2011, this preference was hidden from the user preferences screen as part of efforts to prevent its accidental misuse (consensus discussion). This had the effect of locking users in to their existing preference, which, in your case, was true. To complete the process, your preference will automatically be changed to false in the next few days. This does not require any intervention on your part and you will still be able to manually mark your edits as being 'minor'. The only thing that's changed is that you will no longer have them marked as minor by default.

For established users such as yourself there is a workaround available involving custom JavaScript. If you are familiar with the contents of WP:MINOR, and believe that it is still beneficial to the encyclopedia to have all your edits marked as such by default, then this discussion will give you the details you need to continue with this functionality indefinitely. If you have any problems, feel free to drop me a note.

Thank you for your understanding and happy editing :) Editing on behalf of User:Jarry1250, LivingBot (talk) 18:35, 14 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:50, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Kvaks. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. Mdann52 (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Kvaks. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Pablo Diego José Francisco de Paula Juan Nepomuceno María de los Remedios Cipriano de la Santísima Trinidad Clito Ruiz y Picasso listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Pablo Diego José Francisco de Paula Juan Nepomuceno María de los Remedios Cipriano de la Santísima Trinidad Clito Ruiz y Picasso. Since you had some involvement with the Pablo Diego José Francisco de Paula Juan Nepomuceno María de los Remedios Cipriano de la Santísima Trinidad Clito Ruiz y Picasso redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. — the Man in Question (in question) 19:08, 13 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of The Third and the Mortal

The article The Third and the Mortal has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Appears to fail WP:GNG, and it appears there have never been any references on this article.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. --Ferien (talk) 15:59, 2 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]