User talk:24.69.255.205

Attention:

This IP address, 24.69.255.205, is registered to Shaw Cable proxy and is shared by multiple users. Comments left on this page may be received by other users of this IP and appear to be irrelevant. Caution should be used when blocking this IP or reverting its contributions without checking. In the event of vandalism from this address, efforts will be made to contact Shaw Cable proxy to report abuse.

If you are an unregistered user operating from this address, note that this need not necessarily be the IP address of your machine. In many cases, it turns out to be the IP address of a proxy server that communicates between your browser and the Wikimedia servers. Such proxies are shared among a huge number of users compared to the number of persons using your particular machine. If you are frustrated by irrelevant comments appearing here, you can avoid them by creating an account for yourself. However, you will still be unable to edit Wikipedia while the IP you are using is blocked.

Note: blocks of this IP are causing legitimate user accounts to be blocked, even though this is not their IP address. There appears to be a problem with the way Wikipedia is identifying the address. Therefore, very short blocks only should be applied, and admins should consider protecting the affected articles instead. SlimVirgin ^(talk) 00:59, Apr 12, 2005 (UTC)

Thank you for testing your wikipedia powers. You really can edit any article! Your test on Waterfall worked and was deleted. Please use the Sandbox for future testing. — Ilγαηερ (Tαlκ) 00:53, 13 Dec 2004 (UTC)

Please stop adding nonsense or blanking articles on Wikipedia (such as you did on Waterfall). This will be considered vandalism if it continues. Please use the sandbox for any further testing. — Ilγαηερ (Tαlκ) 00:54, 13 Dec 2004 (UTC)

Cease and Desist. If you continue vandalizing Wikipedia (like you did here), you will be banned.. This is your last warning, I have no qualms about blocking you. — Ilγαηερ (Tαlκ) 00:57, 13 Dec 2004 (UTC)

This user just didn't listen. As this is his/her 24 offense, he/she is now temporarily blocked from wikipedia for a period of Waterfall, see history of [[{{{3}}}]] for more evidence. — Ilγαηερ (Tαlκ) 00:59, 13 Dec 2004 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. -- Francs2000 | Talk [[]] 00:19, 3 Jan 2005 (UTC)

Thanks for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and has now been reverted or removed. Please use Wikipedia:Sandbox for any other tests you want to do, since testing in articles will normally be reverted quickly. Please see the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thanks. -- Francs2000 | Talk [[]] 02:45, 11 Jan 2005 (UTC)

Please do not create articles consisting solely of a link. Wikipedia is an encyclopaedia, not a web directory. --fvw * 02:08, 2005 Jan 15 (UTC)

You added 'WOW!!!' to Adriana Iliescu and nonsense about viruses to Alex Chiu. I've reverted your edits. Don't add this junk to wikipedia or you'll be blocked. Edward 21:50, 2005 Jan 18 (UTC)

You have been temporarily blocked from editing for vandalism of Wikipedia. If you wish to make useful contributions, you may come back after the block expires. --fvw * 05:38, 2005 Jan 23 (UTC)

In the manga version of Cardcaptors, Toya Kinomoto's name is spelled "Toya". WhisperToMe 23:19, 13 Feb 2005 (UTC)

You're about to be blocked again if you're not careful. This is not a repository for weblinks. If you wish to link the terms to the main Anne Shirley article, it's simple: Just type #REDIRECT [[Anne Shirley]] . That's all. - Lucky 6.9 02:34, 8 Feb 2005 (UTC)

Blocked again for repeated vandalism over several months. — Dan | Talk 19:35, 20 Feb 2005 (UTC)

Hong Kong-related topics

Please put on the {{cleanup}}, {{attention}} or {{accuracy}} tag when you're not familiar with the contents, depends on situation. And please get an account. — Insta ntnood 18:48, Mar 21, 2005 (UTC)

Test page at Dragon Ball characters

The page that you created (previously located at Dragon Ball characters) has been deleted. If you were trying to perform a test, it worked. However, for the future, it would be appreciated if you would perform all tests at Wikipedia:Sandbox. If you want to test creating new pages, please use test.wikipedia. Please do not continue to create test pages outside of the test wikipedia, or it may be percieved as vandalism. If you have any questions, feel free to leave me a note on my talk page. -Frazzydee|✍ 06:01, 2 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Mma troll

Your edits at Mma troll are inappropriate. Such language is not appropriate for an encyclopedia, and will not be tolerated. Rick K 08:33, Apr 10, 2005 (UTC)

Problem

Blocks of this IP are causing legitimate user accounts to be blocked, even though this is not their IP address. There appears to be a problem with the way Wikipedia is identifying the address. Therefore, very short blocks only should be applied, and admins should consider vprotecting the affected articles instead, as a temporary measure. SlimVirgin ^(talk) 00:59, Apr 12, 2005 (UTC)

Please do not replace Wikipedia pages with blank content. Blank pages are harmful to Wikipedia because they have a tendency to confuse users. If it is a duplicate article, please redirect it to an appropriate existing page. If the page has been vandalised, please revert it to the last legitimate version. If you feel that the content of a page is inappropriate, please edit the page and replace it with appropriate content. If you believe there is no hope for the page, please see the deletion policy for how to proceed. Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia! Mel Etitis (Μελ Ετητης) 21:38, 16 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Stop putting copyrighted material on Wikipedia. CryptoDerk 22:24, May 3, 2005 (UTC)

Football (soccer)

Please stop adding nonsense to Wikipedia. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. · Katefan0^(scribble) 23:15, May 11, 2005 (UTC)

Thanks for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thanks. → JarlaxleArtemis 03:20, May 19, 2005 (UTC)

Please stop removing content from Wikipedia. It is considered vandalism. If you want to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. drini ☎ 05:41, 24 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

You have been temporarily blocked from editing for vandalism of Wikipedia. If you wish to make useful contributions, you may come back after the block expires. -- Rama 09:49, 24 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Saturn Footer

Would you please come to Template talk:Saturn Footer and explain why you're reverting the Saturn Footer template? The complete listing of moons is excessive to put at the bottom of each and every article, and for those articles where it is warranted there's Template:Saturn Full Footer. Bryan 15:21, 30 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I'm still awaiting some sort of explanation rather than just ongoing reversions. Is there a problem with using Template:Saturn Full Footer where you feel a full listing is warranted? Bryan 29 June 2005 23:28 (UTC)

Yu-Gi-Oh! cards

Please explain the reasoning behind your creation of the following articles:

From Talk:Fundamentalist Christianity

Welcome aboard 24.69.255.205 (I wish you'd sign in at take a user name!). You are tackling one of the more difficult pages. There's some good stuff here, but a lot is disjointed, some inaccurate, and some biased. Some of your edits have added perspective as one who seems to understand Christian fundamentalism. But you have also deleted a lot. If something is wrong or biased, you should correct as much as possible, rather than delete. If it's not wrong or biased, you are disrespecting other past editor's work in deleting. I restored some information you deleted, and you deleted it again. At that point you should be on the talk page explaining why the deletion, and seeking consensus first. Pollinator 01:42, Jun 3, 2005 (UTC)

Surrey School Board

Please stop creating individual articles for each member of the Surrey School Board when all you have to say about them is a verbatim duplicate of the main Surrey School Board article. This constitutes vandalism of Wikipedia. — JIP | Talk 07:43, 3 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Featured articles

I saw you added Fundamentalist Christianity to our Featured articles. You can't just add it to the list - to be added to the list, it has to go through a voting process where it gets reviewed by others. See Wikipedia:featured article candidates. →Raul654 03:09, Jun 4, 2005 (UTC)

Please stop adding nonsense to Wikipedia. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you.--The Grza 07:25, Jun 8, 2005 (UTC)

Repeated vandalism of Caucasoid article

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. --Chanting Fox 18:12, 9 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Please do not replace Wikipedia pages with blank content. Blank pages are harmful to Wikipedia because they have a tendency to confuse readers. If it is a duplicate article, please redirect it to an appropriate existing page. If the page has been vandalised, please revert it to the last legitimate version. If you feel that the content of a page is inappropriate, please edit the page and replace it with appropriate content. If you believe there is no hope for the page, please see the deletion policy for how to proceed. Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia! --Chanting Fox 18:12, 9 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Thanks for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thanks. → JarlaxleArtemis 01:13, Jun 15, 2005 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia.--The Grza 15:46, Jun 16, 2005 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia.--The Grza 23:40, Jun 20, 2005 (UTC)

You have been temporarily blocked from editing for vandalism of Wikipedia. If you wish to make useful contributions, you may come back after the block expires. SlimVirgin ^(talk) 02:53, Jun 25, 2005 (UTC)

names

Royal consorts always revert in biographical articles here and elsewhere to maiden name/maiden title after death. It is the standard way of writing biographies. That is why one writes of Catherine of Aragon, not Queen Catherine, Alexandra of Denmark not Queen Alexandra much less Queen Alexandra the Queen Mother. Wikipedia following normal biographical rules in this regard. FearÉIREANN^(talk) 4 July 2005 01:30 (UTC)

Please stop adding nonsense to Wikipedia. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you.--The Grza July 6, 2005 16:32 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. --Kbdank71 8 July 2005 17:31 (UTC)

Oka Crisis

I appreciate your significant additions to the Oka Crisis article. However, I'm worried that some of your changes are not neutral point of view (WP:NPOV). In particular, the references to the KKK are inflammatory, and really need to be backed up with some solid references. Pburka 00:52, 17 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Italian regions: link spam

Your additions to the pages of the various Italian regions (e.g., Lazio, Umbria, Marche, Molise) are link spam: subpages of "ItalianVisits.com", and nothing else. By adding these inferior pages to articles — when you could at least also have added the good sites on the regions, such as the official sites of each — you are engaging in a link spam campaign, the purpose of which is clearly to draw people to the commercial travel agency behind "ItalianVisits.com". You have even reverted some of the removals. This is not acceptable, and is considered vandalism. See the comments under each of these articles, and please desist. Bill 10:12, 21 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Notice that I'm not embarking on some kind of campaign of my own to eradicate all ItalianVisits.Com pages from the links in Wikipedia; I'm happy to see that your pages on Campania do meet a good standard for Wikipedia links; and Tuscany, though marginal, gets the benefit of the doubt from me so far. There may be others. Again, my aim is just to keep Wikipedia from drowning in links to sites of dubious value: you probably need to look at Wikipedia's policy on external links. Bill 14:16, 21 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

You are reverting, and on Umbria have reached the 3-revert limit; further reverts can get you blocked. See Three-revert rule. Bill 15:06, 21 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Vanity

The person you have written about in the article Julian Bentley -- possibly yourself -- is not well-known enough to merit an article of his own. The Wikipedia community welcomes newcomers, and encourages them to become Wikipedians. By starting an account or logging in, each user is entitled to a user page in which they can describe themselves, and this article's content may be incorporated into that page. However, to merit inclusion in the encyclopedia proper a subject must be notable. We encourage you to write or improve articles on notable subjects. --Calton | Talk 05:03, July 22, 2005 (UTC)

Who is Julian Bentley? I wrote no such article.

The delete log says that you did, at 04:04, 20 June 2005 — and that you edited the article twelve more times on the same day ([1]). --Mel Etitis (Μελ Ετητης) 22:06, 22 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

It may be someone else who shares the same IP number as me.

OK, if that's not you, you're in bad company, like you say. You will find it advantageous to follow the standard advice given below: "an IP address can be shared by several users. If you are an anonymous user and feel that irrelevant comments have been directed at you, please create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other anonymous users." As things now stand, 24.69.255.205 is almost exclusively a source of spam, and we're quite capable of blocking all of you. Bill 23:31, 22 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Notability of Ian Christy

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Ian Christy, by GlassFET (talk · contribs), another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Ian Christy seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Ian Christy, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to leave a message on the bot operator's talk page if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. --Android Mouse Bot 2 20:09, 17 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Min Chen

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Min Chen, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. MBisanz ^talk 07:35, 21 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Doris Mae Oulton

The article Doris Mae Oulton has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unreferenced BLP, unimproved since 2005, unclear notability as Google brings up only Wikipedia mirrors

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Iain99^{Balderdash and piffle} 23:49, 20 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Maxwell_Kane

The article Maxwell_Kane has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

There are no sources and it doesn't seem notable enough.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Glimmer721 ^talk 22:23, 12 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Extreme Dodgeball for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Extreme Dodgeball is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Extreme Dodgeball until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. ~T P W 11:25, 6 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Heather Stilwell for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Heather Stilwell is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Heather Stilwell until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. West Eddy (talk) 22:46, 26 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Redeemer Pacific College for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Redeemer Pacific College is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Redeemer Pacific College until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Walter Görlitz (talk) 06:48, 11 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Natural phenomenon for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Natural phenomenon is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Natural phenomenon until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Ypnypn (talk) 15:56, 12 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Kenneth Montgomery Keillor for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Kenneth Montgomery Keillor is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kenneth Montgomery Keillor (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Bearcat (talk) 18:51, 28 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Yumegari

The article Yumegari has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

no assertion of importance and seems to fail WP:NBOOK

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Toddst1 (talk) 22:04, 11 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

International network listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect International network. Since you had some involvement with the International network redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. - Champion (talk) (contribs) (Formerly TheChampionMan1234) 04:30, 13 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The international network listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect The international network. Since you had some involvement with the The international network redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. - Champion (talk) (contribs) (Formerly TheChampionMan1234) 04:30, 13 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

"Orichalcos Duels" listed at Redirects for discussion

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Orichalcos Duels. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 October 24#Orichalcos Duels until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 23:35, 24 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Moody Middle School for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Moody Middle School is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Moody Middle School (3rd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. // Timothy :: talk 17:09, 3 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Route of Ages for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Route of Ages is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Route of Ages until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Sammi Brie (she/her • t • c) 22:25, 30 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Hulk (Ultimate Marvel character) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Hulk (Ultimate Marvel character) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hulk (Ultimate Marvel character) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Josh Milburn (talk) 07:54, 31 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

"Marshie" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Marshie has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 September 27 § Marshie until a consensus is reached. 1234qwer 1234qwer 4 00:23, 27 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This is the discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users. Registering also hides your IP address.