Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2000s music groups

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete all ɑʀкʏɑɴ 19:21, 4 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

2000s music groups

This article is redundant with the Category:2000s music groups. I am also nominating the following related pages because they all fail in the same way as being redundant with their respective categories of the same name:

There is no need to merge the information on the page. The categorization of each group's article will suffice. Keeping this list separately introduces all kinds of problems and should be considered Listcruft. Maher-shalal-hashbaz 01:33, 30 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, redundant to categories. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(Broken clamshells•Otter chirps•Review?)} 02:25, 30 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, redundant. This is why we have categories, boys and girls. Realkyhick 02:55, 30 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete If it is just a list (with no/minimal description in each one), create a category and delete the article as "redundant". Same applies here.--PrestonH 03:11, 30 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. Maxa megalon 2000 05:03, 30 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete With info transferred to categories Mbisanz 06:02, 30 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete all. Redundant to categories. Thin Arthur 06:12, 30 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom, Thin Arthur and Mbisanz.--JForget 22:35, 30 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Simon Says Delete all Thin Arthur and I are the only ones who voted to Delete All. Oh, I guess the nominator did too. Since nobody's voting to Keep All, it looks unanimous. Mandsford 22:38, 31 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete all. Redundant. DJBullfish 03:28, 1 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Keep and rewrite, could be rewritten to not be redundant with categories. For example, a year of foundation could be added. Grue 06:21, 1 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Move to 2000s in music, 1990s in music, 1980s in music, 1970s in music,1960s in music, Delete the list portion, Rewrite the intro with sources. HokieRNB 17:28, 1 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.