Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Boundary Element Method

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was move to Boundary element method and keep. – AB CD 01:32, 7 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Boundary Element Method

Delete Looks like a student project, this whole article appeared in one chunk. WP is not an archive for personal data. It is interesting, but I'm not about to assign it a grade. Either this needs a LOT of cleanup and wikifying, or should be axed.
- Unsigned by BigFatDave. [1] —Korath (Talk) 01:28, Apr 1, 2005 (UTC)
Delete. Essay. Personal research. Postdlf 03:58, 27 Mar 2005 (UTC)
- Keep rewrite. Postdlf 17:20, 3 Apr 2005 (UTC)
~~Delete~~ Charles Matthews 21:17, 28 Mar 2005 (UTC)
- Now a keep. Charles Matthews 15:41, 1 Apr 2005 (UTC)
Comment: This was apparently never listed on vfd, so I'm putting it on today's page. —Korath (Talk) 01:28, Apr 1, 2005 (UTC)
~~Delete~~ unless completely reworked. Currently a signed personal essay. Average Earthman 11:13, 1 Apr 2005 (UTC)
- Now completely reworked, so keep. Average Earthman 16:01, 3 Apr 2005 (UTC)
Keep, redirect to proper case, and rewrite. Boldly, I have put up a stub at Boundary element method and redirected this page to it. FreplySpang (talk) 15:38, 1 Apr 2005 (UTC)
Keep in the redirected form. 129.97.140.98 17:49, 1 Apr 2005 (UTC)
Keep the newly written stub, looks good. --Duk 07:40, 3 Apr 2005 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.