Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/"Nyak Tso"
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was move to Nyak Tso. – ugen64 19:27, 6 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Personal page. There's content, but should either be deleted or made into an article. Splintercellguy 17:30, 22 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep — it appears to be a valid location AFAIK, but only two or so sentences in the article are actually relevant. The questions and contact information could probably just be moved into the discussion page. *shrug* — RJH 18:27, 22 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep, real place. I cut out most of it. Kappa 18:48, 22 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: Not a real place with quotation marks. The article would need to be moved. Why not just create a new article at the proper location and delete this, since we're already having to strip out the personal matter? Geogre 19:21, 22 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Moving a page is easier than making a new one. Kappa 19:59, 22 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Easier? Have you done any page moves? Given that the content is no longer the words of the original author, we don't have to worry about GFDL preservation of history. Even a hunt and peck typist could recreate this miniscule factoid more easily (or ctr-v/ctrl-p in the editing screen) than go through the move and sit there with a useless redirect. Why try to preserve someone's random litter? Geogre 02:41, 23 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Moving a page is easier than making a new one. Kappa 19:59, 22 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Move to Nyak Tso and then delete the redirect. — A.M. 23:23, 22 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Why delete the redirect? It might come in useful. Kappa 23:37, 22 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- If this article should have a redirect with the name in quotes, so should all the rest, and that would be too many redirects. — A.M. 23:55, 22 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Redirects are cheap. Kappa 21:56, 23 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- If this article should have a redirect with the name in quotes, so should all the rest, and that would be too many redirects. — A.M. 23:55, 22 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Why delete the redirect? It might come in useful. Kappa 23:37, 22 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Rename. And redirects-with-quotes are a bad idea; the next MediaWiki software will likely auto-strip quotes from search queries. Radiant_* 11:22, May 23, 2005 (UTC)
- Keep and move. Please make obvious moves before bringing to VfD. For one thing, it enables backlinks that show whether this page was wanted or relevant elsewhere. Charles Matthews 12:13, 23 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Rename per Radiant. carmeld1 00:25, 25 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.