Talk:Travis County, Texas

United States: Texas / Austin / U.S. counties Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Texas portal This article is supported by WikiProject Texas (assessed as Mid-importance).
	Texas portal This article is supported by WikiProject Texas - Austin (assessed as Top-importance).
	This article is supported by WikiProject U.S. counties.

Untitled

Wondering how to edit this U.S. County Entry?
The WikiProject U.S. Counties standards might help.

Thanks! Those guidelines were very helpful. -Bryanrutherford0 (talk) 16:27, 21 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

History

Current entry says "8000 b.c. Early native American inhabitants include Tonkawa, Lipan Apache, Comanche, Kiowa.[3]" Apache, Comanche, and Kiowa were certainly not in Texas in 8000 B.C. Tonkawa maybe, but that is unknown. The type of Native Americans in Texas in 8000 b.c. is unknown (as I understand the state of affairs on the topic)rdenndy (talk) 00:34, 22 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Indeed so; hopefully the new section is more clear. -Bryanrutherford0 (talk) 16:27, 21 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Should the Culture Section be Moved Under Politics?

The section titled "Culture" reads like the "Politics" section of this article as well as that of other U.S. counties. Some of the information in that section is already found in the Politics section. I feel like the Proposition 2 sentence should be moved under Politics, and the rest deleted. I do think there's plenty of culture in Travis County besides politics, but that's already in the Austin article. So while I'm not sure the Culture section should be kept or not, I definitely think we should remove the redundancies between the two sections, and prioritize politics under the Politics tab. — Preceding unsigned comment added by T-Ro Trains (talk • contribs) 02:57, 14 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Absolutely; the coverage is disproportionate. -Bryan Rutherford (talk) 12:31, 14 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]