User talk:Chrissmith

Private Links/Things for transfer between Pc's

Temp storage

http://network.nature.com/groups/bpcc/forum/topics/2828 —Preceding unsigned comment added by 137.205.21.47 (talk) 13:36, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

IONA Debating Circuit

Thanks for you question. The issue with posting anything on wikipedia is the need for the information not only for it to be correct but but also verifiable - so when an editor makes a claim they need to provide a reliable source for it or risk having it removed - as in the case of the results you posted.

I am happy to post the results back, however I do question the reliability of the source that you give - it does not seem to be an official source - do you have any other source, for example on the headed paper of the IONA Debating Circuit ? Codf1977 (talk) 19:12, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

There is no single organisation that is the IONA debating circuit, it is simply a descriptive term. In regards to the result of the warwick IV, how more official can it get than the result posted on their own web page? Would a student newspaper suffice as a source, if and when it gets reported? Chrissmith (talk) 19:44, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Yes a student newspaper would be better than a Excel file that anyone could have created. Codf1977 (talk) 19:56, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Historic value

The article Historic value has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

WP:DICTDEF/WP:SUBSTUB unreferenced for over 10 years. No indication the term has notability.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 11:06, 24 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Historic value for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Historic value is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Historic value until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 07:43, 19 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]