Jump to content

Talk:Western Roman Empire

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Good articleWestern Roman Empire has been listed as one of the History good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
February 22, 2018Good article nomineeNot listed
July 30, 2018Good article nomineeNot listed
December 16, 2018Good article nomineeListed
January 25, 2019WikiProject A-class reviewNot approved
Current status: Good article


Map of the Empire

[edit]

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Western_Roman_Empire_-_400_AD.png I believe this map would make a better map than the current one. It has more time accurate coastlines, more cities, and shows the western empire closer to it's peak. The first map shown on the Byzantine Empire article is also at it's peak, same with the Roman Empire article, so why should the first map show the Western Empire after it lost land? It feels more appropriate for a section further down. Also, the suggested map is in english while the current one is in spanish, and an english map would be preferable I believe for an english wikipedia article. If the issue is sources, I could see if the original poster can provide some as we've talked before. I am sure she could provide, as she has made many historical maps in the past. MrsColdArrow (talk) 05:49, 15 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I tried to find any issues with the map, but honestly I couldn't find them. It shows more cities, looks cleaner, and is in English. I don't really agree that the empire necessarily needs to be shown at its peak, though. In fact, showing the barbarian territories inside of Rome's borders would better represent the issues the empire was facing at the time, but honestly it doesn't matter. 296cherry (talk) 18:33, 27 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
One of the cities is labelled 'Pissmouth'? Was that a Roman city I'm unaware of? 161.184.237.144 (talk) 19:40, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Retrospective Term?

[edit]

I once read a contemporary account of "Western Romans" (they used that term) visiting the court of Atilla. They mentioned that "Eastern Romans" were also present. This says to me that it makes perfect sense to speak of a "Western Roman Empire" as a contemporary concept. The way to tell me I'm wrong about this is to cite a source that backs up the claim that nobody talked about a WRE before the middle ages

I have an agenda here: I'd really like to apply WP:REFERS to the opening sentence. But that's difficult as long as the definition of WRE is contentious. Isaac Rabinovitch (talk) 23:38, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have removed the text completely. Beshogur (talk) 17:35, 15 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Map quality

[edit]

A lot of cities are wrongly placed, one of the cities is labelled 'Pissmouth' and some of the city dots don't have names next to them 161.184.237.144 (talk) 19:39, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You would need to be more specific in order to communicate what issues you're talking about regarding the map. I couldn't figure it out. Remsense ‥  20:43, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]