Talk:Jardin du Luxembourg

France: Paris Mid‑importance

	France portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject France, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of France on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FranceWikipedia:WikiProject FranceTemplate:WikiProject FranceFrance articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Paris task force.

Horticulture and Gardening Low‑importance

	Gardening portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Horticulture and Gardening, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Horticulture and Gardening on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Horticulture and GardeningWikipedia:WikiProject Horticulture and GardeningTemplate:WikiProject Horticulture and GardeningHorticulture and gardening articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Check : http://www.mairie6.paris.fr/mairie6/jsp/Portail.jsp?id_page=232

Suggested merge

There can't be any gain in comprehension or context by separating the Garden from Luxembourg Palace. Would anyone object to the merge? --Wetman 06:04, 24 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not really certain either way. I was on vacation recently in Paris. The first thing that was suggested that we do is to visit the garden. The garden itself is a place of gathering for both tourists and Parisians. We were privileged to have shared that moment with other Parisians one early Saturday morning. There were joggers and children playing; and even a local science fair. My point is, the palace is just one focal point - it's nice to look at, but all the fun activities occur on the palace grounds (which happens to be the largest public park/garden in Paris). ,,,,Ariele 04:36, 7 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I object strongly. The garden is more important to the public than the palace and the article can be more appropriately categorised if it is kept separate. CalJW 20:14, 7 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Page Move

Does anyone call it the "Luxembourg Garden"? I feel like in English it is usually called by the French name, the Jardin du Luxembourg. This is, for instance, what my guidebook calls it. We don't have articles at Paris City Hall, Royal Palace, Vosges Place, Orsay Museum, and so forth. john k 21:41, 1 June 2006 (UTC))[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Jardin du Luxembourg. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080510233829/http://www.pps.org/great_public_spaces/one?public_place_id=39 to http://www.pps.org/great_public_spaces/one?public_place_id=39

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:06, 22 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]