Talk:Video game publisher

Video games High‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Video games, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of video games on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Video gamesWikipedia:WikiProject Video gamesTemplate:WikiProject Video gamesvideo game articles

High

This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks:

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks

AfDs

Merge discussions

Other discussions

No major discussions

Interplay & LucasArts

Are Interplay Entertainment and LucasArts video game publishers? I thought LucasArts was a developer and that Interplay was owned by Electronic Arts. —Frecklefoot 19:12, 4 Sep 2003 (UTC)

LucasArts is still a publisher. Interplay is majority-owned by French publisher Titus, but is still a separate company (IPLY.OB). Interplay was a publisher for years and recently shed many, but not all, of the normal functions of a publisher.

Former Publisher

I started a 'notable former publishers' section which I'm not sure is a great idea -- what's a 'former' publisher? Microprose, for example, merged with Spectrum Holobyte, then the whole entity was purchased by Hasbro Interactive, which then went over to Infogrames (now Atari) in a long term license. At this point Microprose is just a brand and not an organization, so is it a former publisher? If an X-Com game comes out, they might brand it as a Microprose game. Perhaps the 'former' list should show what happened to them to make them 'former' publishers.

That's not a bad idea. Weird things do happen and it'd be nice to have an explanation as to what happened. I added Accolade, but they were swallowed up by Infogrames which is now Atari!

How do you know so much about the game industry anyway? I used to be a game programmer (kind of wish I still was) so I was involved in a lot of the changes.

BTW, great edit on the Hasbro Interactive article. I like your wording much better. :-) —Frecklefoot 20:27, 5 Sep 2003 (UTC)

Investor interest

The section was rewritten as it was stated that "video game publishers who are publicly traded on stock markets are not known as a successful group." This is either subjective, misleading or plain false: many publishers' stocks have outperformed the S&P over the years. Shawnc 15:13, 26 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I disagree. EA is the only pure video game company that has succeeded "over the years". Activision has been hot for the last three years but before that was in the dumps, and of course was bankrupt before that. Take Two's success is a recent story, not something that has lasted even ten years. Infogrames, Majesco, Interplay, Midway ... there have been many disasters. Can you cite even three video game publishers that have outperformed the S&P over a long period of time? Microsoft and Sony don't count, of course. Tempshill 00:44, 1 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Publisher question for you smart people

If company A develops a game and it is published for, say PS3 by company B. In 6 years time, who would have the rights to allow it's emulation on the PS4? The developer or the publisher?

It depends on how the publishing agreement was worked out. If the developer (A) retained the intellectual property (IP) of the game (like the characters, universe, plot), they have to right to develop any derivitive works based on the IP. But often the publisher gains ownership of the IP (or owned it to begin with, and just contracted A to develop the game using it). But the copyright of the game itself is another matter. It all depends on how the details were worked out in the publishing contract. Sometimes the developer has the copyright, sometimes the publisher does. But, I'd say, most often, the publisher has the copyright.

But emulation is another question. I don't think you need anyone's "permission" to truly emulate a game. For example, if I own an old Apple II copy of The Oregon Trail and I rip the disk image of it and use it on an emulator on my PC, I'm not violating anyone's right. I'm using the software that I paid for, but using it on a piece of software that uses the original software. If you're talking about making a clone of the game—using the same characters, setting and whatnot, than it depends on who owns the copyright. But if you're talking about writing a true emulator, well, I would assume that the PS4 would be backwards compatible with the PS3, so there would be no need. :-) HTH — Frecklefoot | Talk 21:51, 9 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Compensation

If you see the other articles of jobs in this topic, all have a compensation section. What's the compensation for this job? Clonecommander (talk) 03:23, 1 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

A publisher is a company, not an individual or job title (such as game programmer or game producer). As such, there is no "compensation". For example, what's the compensation for being a book publisher? The question doesn't make any sense.

However, revenue for publishers is directly tied to sales of titles. — Frεcklεfσσt | Talk 12:48, 1 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

huh. didn't think of it like that. thx for clearing it up Clonecommander (talk) 02:59, 3 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Former publishers list

I move that we don't need the list of former notable publishers. After all, we have the list of video game publishers, and it includes defunct publishers as well as current ones. The list started out small, but grew as people added their favorite former publishers. I don't think it really adds anything to the article at all, except pointing out that a lot of video game publishers went out of business. The list is a much better source for this information, and is undergoing a revamp, so it looks better than ever. The list of former publishers in this article is just clutter. Anyone object to removing it entirely? — Frεcklεfσσt | Talk 13:03, 19 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Support removal. — H3llkn0wz ▎talk 15:39, 19 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Since the only response has been approval, removing the list. — Frεcklεfσσt | Talk 20:43, 22 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

royalties

From the article: " All significant console manufacturers since Nintendo with its NES (1985) have monopolized the manufacture of every game made for their console, and have required all publishers to pay a royalty for every game so manufactured."

Did the original Xbox charge royalties? I heard there were no game royalties for the original Xbox, though Microsoft kept control of releases for the console. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 192.197.54.34 (talk) 01:50, 7 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

What about ZeniMax Media (Bethesda)?

Shouldn't it be on either list? Izmou (talk) 00:30, 15 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

SIE is based in the US not Japan

SIE is a US-based company, not a Japanese one. In 2016 the company moved its global HQ from Japan to California. See here for a report on this: https://www.wsj.com/articles/sony-moves-playstation-headquarters-to-california-1453794813?mg=prod/accounts-wsj

Also, see the SIE corporate page which lists its HQ in San Mateo: http://www.sie.com/en/corporate.html 76.220.53.75 (talk) 04:21, 16 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Someone keeps changing the SIE flag to Japan. SIE is not a Japanese company, Sony is. Just as Sony Pictures Entertainment (based in Culver City, CA) and Sony Music Entertainment (based in New York, NY) are American subsidiaries for Sony's film, television, and music businesses, SIE (based in San Mateo, CA) is an American company which is responsible for Sony's gaming business. I added a citation for SIE to show that it is an American company. Please do not change it unless you have a more recent and contradicting citation. 64.211.224.254 (talk) 02:09, 30 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Stop changing the SIE flag to Japan. As can be seen from the reference, the headquarters of SIE is in the United States.69.36.132.252 (talk) 22:42, 20 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Video game publisher. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20131221025605/http://www.xbox.com/ru-RU/xbox-360/why-xbox-360 to http://www.xbox.com/ru-RU/xbox-360/why-xbox-360

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:13, 9 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Project Managers

The description of a Project Manager's responsibilities is inaccurate. They don't simply "monitor progress" and "help out when necessary". In the game industry, a Project Manager is often called a Game Director, and drives the entire project and team. They're responsible for meeting all deadlines and milestones; they manage and report on the budget and spending to date; collect requirements, build out and then manage and update the project plan throughout the entire development cycle; report on progress to all stakeholders on a daily/weekly/monthly/annual basis; coordinate and schedule testing (often in coordination with a QA manager); the list goes on and on. Much more and fundamentally different from what was stated in this wiki. 73.225.12.9 (talk) 00:18, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Video Game Publishers Graph.png

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 00:52, 28 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

"Video game publication" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Video game publication and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 April 5#Video game publication until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion. -Liance^{talk/contribs} 23:26, 5 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki Education assignment: Technology and Culture

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 28 August 2023 and 15 December 2023. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Asiloves (article contribs).

— Assignment last updated by Adrishaw (talk) 15:31, 28 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Neutral language

I can't quite put my finger on it, but the way this article is written feels not quite right. What do you guys think? Kisequé (talk) 08:26, 17 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]