Talk:Error detection and correction
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Error detection and correction article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1Auto-archiving period: 365 days |
This level-4 vital article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
EDAC (error detection and correction)
[edit]I usually hear the phrase "error detection and correction" (EDAC) rather than "error correction and detection". What does Google say? --DavidCary 00:42, 21 September 2005 (UTC)
- Article we renamed at one point perhaps in appreciation of this. ~Kvng (talk) 23:54, 16 July 2022 (UTC)
My mam have two sisters
[edit]My mam have two sisters 84.54.70.181 (talk) 14:03, 16 April 2023 (UTC)
Ancient Jewish history should be backed up or deleted
[edit]The section on Ancient Jewish bible copyists feels highly anachronistic, and the relevance of its content and cited sources to this article is dubious. I suggest that anyone who believes this section should be kept begin by providing some evidence from a writer (a historian, journalist, scientist, etc.) with expertise in the article's subject that the practice can be traced back to this Ancient Jewish practice. Then we can begin to discuss how pertinent this information to the history of error detection and correction. Otherwise, the relationship is merely associative and folklorish. Zelous cat (talk) 08:48, 17 June 2023 (UTC)
- @Zelous cat Agreed. It's certainly very interesting, but none of the cited research actually links it to modern error-checking, which would make this original synthesis. Nicknimh (talk) 12:40, 11 December 2023 (UTC)
- @Nicknimh It is interesting. Hopefully someone finds the sources to include it in this article or another. For now I have removed the paragraph. Zelous cat (talk) 10:27, 17 December 2023 (UTC)
- I'm just seeing this discussion. I have restored the material. I think you're setting a inappropriately high bar for sourcing in a C-class article. I will try to make improvements. It will not happen immediately. ~Kvng (talk) 16:27, 22 December 2023 (UTC)
- @Nicknimh It is interesting. Hopefully someone finds the sources to include it in this article or another. For now I have removed the paragraph. Zelous cat (talk) 10:27, 17 December 2023 (UTC)
- C-Class level-4 vital articles
- Wikipedia level-4 vital articles in Mathematics
- C-Class vital articles in Mathematics
- C-Class Telecommunications articles
- Unknown-importance Telecommunications articles
- C-Class Computer science articles
- High-importance Computer science articles
- WikiProject Computer science articles
- C-Class mathematics articles
- Unknown-priority mathematics articles
- Old requests for peer review