Talk:Miniature wargaming

	Games portal This article is part of WikiProject Board and table games, an attempt to better organize information in articles related to board games and tabletop games. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.Board and table gamesWikipedia:WikiProject Board and table gamesTemplate:WikiProject Board and table gamesboard and table game articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Military history

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Additional information:
/
	No existing task force includes this article in its scope; to propose a new one, please leave a message on the main project talk page.

Archives

Untitled

I've removed the following from the overview: "...many historical systems presume that one figure represents (from smallest to largest) a squad, platoon, company (UK: "squadron", Artillery: "battery"), battalion (UK: "regiment"), brigade (US: "regiment") or a division." It's somewhat misleading, as it implies British infantry companies would be called squadrons, which they're generally not. Squadrons are units of signallers, engineers, the SAS etc. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 203.206.199.16 (talk) 11:15, 24 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Some issues

Scales

Scales section seems incomplete. No mention of 1:287 scale, e.g. for micro armour (anyone remember Tractics? Tacforce?). No mention of the terms "micro" (1:100) or "micro-condensed" (1:400).

added more popular 2 and 3mm scales

I think you can roll 1:285/1:287 and 1:300 (ie: 6mm) into the same bracket. You're essentially talking about the same type of game, and people often mix the two in the same game. 2p0rk (talk) 08:08, 13 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Air wargames section

There's a section for air minis - really? I've never seen a game in which air is more than secondary. This section is no help at all. There is no citation and no example. In fact, miniatures are never mentioned in the section. Is someone confused? Hopeful?

You've never seen Wings of War/ Wings of Glory played? X-wing is essentially the same game. They're a minority, but they are played. 2p0rk (talk) 08:09, 13 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

No Armor type section

There's no section for Armor or modern battlefield miniature wargames? (or whatever WWII and modern vehicle-based tactical combat should be called.) Anyone remember Tractics? Tacforce? etc etc.. ? This seems to be a major oversight.
Dmforcier (talk) 01:00, 3 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

So? Most periods aren't mentioned specifically, you won't find any mention of Naps in the article either. It's a general overview of the hobby, individual rule sets are listed in List_of_miniature_wargames and broken down by period. 2p0rk (talk) 08:14, 13 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

No Sci-fi section

Star Fleet Battles, Ogre/GEV, etc. etc...
Dmforcier (talk) 17:32, 3 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

There used to be a picture of Warhammer 40K miniatures. Not sure where that went in the article. Protonk (talk) 21:11, 3 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Designers

Could we add Bruce Rea Taylor of TTG? I grew up on his rules. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.154.7.190 (talk) 15:28, 28 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Miniature wargaming. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20070609121147/http://www.hmgs.org/history.htm to http://www.hmgs.org/history.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 03:11, 4 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Miniature wargaming. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:16, 12 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified (February 2018)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 5 external links on Miniature wargaming. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:35, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Should we have a category for out of print minitarure wargames?

Please see the discussion at Talk:Collectible_card_game#Should_we_have_a_category_for_out_of_print_CCGs? which is pretty relevant for this type of game as well, I think. --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 02:04, 8 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]