Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hurricade
Neologism and confessed invention of Litefantastic (see his talk page). -- Cyrius|✎ 02:54, 25 Sep 2004 (UTC)
- Delete. Neologism. — Gwalla | Talk 03:51, 25 Sep 2004 (UTC)
- Delete. Concur. --Golbez 04:39, Sep 25, 2004 (UTC)
- Delete. Not even a word. --Improv 06:31, 25 Sep 2004 (UTC)
- Made-up word. Deletificate. See, I can make up words too. --Slowking Man 09:26, Sep 25, 2004 (UTC)
- Delete. Neologism. — Trilobite (Talk) 09:57, 25 Sep 2004 (UTC)
- Delete. Stupid neologism. Awolf002 13:00, 25 Sep 2004 (UTC)
- Delete. Could've been speed deleted. Now what's this noise [1] about User:Litefantastic wanting to be an administrator? As e says, I confess that I have a tendancy to abuse the Wikipedia in that I will often invent words. ... I actually turned myself in a couple of times (like on 'ladder-down reaction', which had everyone fooled). Hmm. Wile E. Heresiarch 14:20, 26 Sep 2004 (UTC)
- Delete. Rich Hall would be aghast. Spatch 14:29, 26 Sep 2004 (UTC)
- Delete. Not in AHD4. Don't know what Litefantastic's motive is, but see Wikipedia:Don't disrupt Wikipedia to illustrate a point. I don't see the humor in pulling pranks in Wikipedia's main namespace. [[User:Dpbsmith|Dpbsmith (talk)]] 18:07, 26 Sep 2004 (UTC)
- Okay, okay: I'm sorry. Looking below, I can't say I knew what my motive is either. Probably I thought is sounded catchy. I don't think "Rich Hall would be aghast" (actually, I think he'd be amused), but at the same time I confess I broke the rules, and I really do apollogize. Furthermore, I promise that when, in the future, I do make up new words, I won't start at the Wikipedia. Word of honor. I hereby promise to use my powers only for good, and renounce my life of crime. That being said, I have no intention, at least not yet, of running for admin. I'm still kind of hoping I'll be nominated or something (although I probably rather damaged my chances). However, I have found all sorts of good things to keep my safely occupied, such as the Cavalcade of the week.