Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Oké bananas

Oké bananas was proposed for deletion. This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record. The result of the debate was to redirect.

This, and a whole bunch of other pages created today by the same anonymous user, strike me as little more than advertisement. --Woggly 17:42, 21 Nov 2004 (UTC) Additional pages are: Kuyichi, Solidaridad (borderline encyclopedic), AgroFair Just to clarify: I think that the concepts, and some of the organisations, are probably encyclopedic. But individual brands I think is stretching it a bit far.

• Uncertain. I think that Fairtrade, as an organisation could do with its own page. At the moment it is lumped in with Fair trade the concept. Jeff Knaggs 17:55, 21 Nov 2004 (UTC)
• Delete: As individual brands, these deserve a mention at the parent article. Fairtrade is worth an article, and its brands can be mentioned there. Further, these articles are substubs that merely say "is a brand of company." Predicate nominatives are not sufficient content. Geogre 20:36, 21 Nov 2004 (UTC)
• Some brands deserve articles (e.g. Oreo, a brand of Kraft Foods [I think]). With 404 Google hits, this doesn't really cut it. Redirect to Fairtrade. [[User:Meelar|Meelar (talk)]] 20:47, Nov 21, 2004 (UTC)
• Redirect to Fairtrade. a) Not notable enough for its own article, and b) there's really nothing in the article. [[User:Dpbsmith|Dpbsmith (talk)]] 16:28, 22 Nov 2004 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like other '/delete' pages is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion or on the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.