Talk:Autodesk Animator

	Science portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Science, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Science on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ScienceWikipedia:WikiProject ScienceTemplate:WikiProject Sciencescience articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Media

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Media, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Media on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MediaWikipedia:WikiProject MediaTemplate:WikiProject MediaMedia articles

???

This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Media To-do List:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Mackay Radio
Cleanup : Media influence, Video game culture, Sound bite
NPOV : Content (media and publishing)
Verify : Multimedia, Alternative media, Alternative newspaper
Other :
- Answer requests for comments

Since Animator is no longer supported, I can feel free to promote it. This is without doubt the best piece of software I have ever used. My employer embedded animator files into its multimedia CD-ROMs, and almost anything was possible. It played full screen animations on a 386 (as long as the animations were carefully designed). I have never seen anything that rivals it for handling a palette, before or since. The only weaknesses were poor fonts and dithering, but these problems could be overcome. At the time, Macromedia Director was advertised as the number one animation tool, but in comparison to Animator, Director was awkward, amateurish, very limited and painfully slow. Since then, Director has greatly improved, and Flash makes it a high quality animation tool at last. But back then it was laughable in comparison. But I remember it being promoted as an animation tool, and as a result it took me years to take Director seriously. The same can be said for other DOS and Windows based animators of the time. Another thing I liked was the crisp, clean animations. Most bitmap based animation formats (e.g. AVI) use lossy compression. As a result, animations created in Animator can become five or ten times bigger, and look much worse, when converted to AVI (depending on the codec used). My large Animator files played smoothly and beautifully even from a two speed CD. O.K., I have raved enough. I really, really liked this product. Please note that I refer to Animator Pro. Animator Studio (the later Windows version) was a brave attempt to incorporate 24 bit color and sound, but it was buggy and slow, and nothing like as useful as Animator Pro. Animator Pro is sadly missed. - Chris Tolworthy

Good lord, the grammar in this article was/is atrocious. It's most definitely not written like an encyclopedia article. I started to to a bit of cleaning but gave up. Regardless, Animator was a great application. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.43.19.24 (talk) 02:35, 12 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Remove promotional information

Removed promotional information from article as it was not appropriate for an encyclopedia article. Please cite references on any factual information and avoid posting personal opinions. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.196.191.104 (talk) 12:54, 5 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

https://books.google.de/books?id=hqQJaNzN9IcC&pg=PA452&lpg=PA452&dq=%22autodesk+animator+pro%22&source=bl&ots=w7IhjENfW8&sig=SGamQQjJ1BCFA3u7HaEVNtW9mo4&hl=de&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwiX-7TekpfSAhUERhQKHeNNCsE4ChDoAQgoMAU#v=onepage&q=%22autodesk%20animator%20pro%22&f=false

Would be nice to know version release information. --98.70.122.108 (talk) 20:57, 1 July 2009 (UTC)Jay C.[reply]