User talk:DeRossitt

(Sorry, I guess nobody has given you the standard greeting yet, so here it is...)

Welcome!

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

How to edit a page
Editing, policy, conduct, and structure tutorial
Picture tutorial
How to write a great article
Naming conventions
Manual of Style
If you're ready for the complete list of Wikipedia documentation, there's also Wikipedia:Topical index.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and vote pages using three tildes, like this: ~~~. Four tildes (~~~~) produces your name and the current date. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my Talk page. Again, welcome!

Zzyzx11 | Talk 20:26, 24 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Orange Mound

Welcome to Wikipedia! I'd just like to thank you for your article on Orange Mound -- you write well, and I think you did a good job. Actually, I have another reason to be grateful -- a friend and I had been planning on writing this article (see a few peliminary notes we've put together), and we were pleasantly surprised to see that someone else had decided to do a good deal of our work for us, as it were. In the next couple of weeks, we plan on adding quite a bit to your article. So thanks for getting this project (that you didn't even know about) off to a great start, and for saving us some time;) I look forward to your comments about our additions -- Wikipedia is at its best when its editors collaborate. Do you live in Orange Mound or did you once live there? Just wondering.

P.S. I like how the article is organized. --Zantastik 07:42, 27 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for File:Cover image of What Should Legal Analysis Become.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Cover image of What Should Legal Analysis Become.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 20:05, 31 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of The Religion of the Future

Hello Derossitt,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged The Religion of the Future for deletion, because it seems to be promotional, rather than an encyclopedia article.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. MarkYabloko 09:31, 11 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:49, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 29

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Free Trade Reimagined: The World Division of Labor and the Method of Economics, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Francisco Rodriguez. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:44, 29 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free rationale for File:Cover image of The Religion of the Future.png

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Cover image of The Religion of the Future.png. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 17:41, 2 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Barnstar for you

		The Writer's Barnstar
		Hi, I give you this beautiful writer's barnstar for creating the bibliograhy of Roberto Mangabeira Unger Lamro (talk) 07:43, 8 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A page you started (The Left Alternative) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating The Left Alternative, DeRossitt!

Wikipedia editor Prof tpms just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Good work

To reply, leave a comment on Prof tpms's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Wikipedia email re Newspapers.com signup

Hello, DeRossitt. Please check your email; you've got mail!
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.

HazelAB (talk) 16:18, 9 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your Newspapers.com free account

You should have access now. Please note that our accounts do not include access to Publisher Extra content. HazelAB (talk) 22:02, 13 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, DeRossitt. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. Mdann52 (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, DeRossitt. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, DeRossitt. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of School of London

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on School of London requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, images, a rephrasing of the title, a question that should have been asked at the help or reference desks, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Boleyn (talk) 06:17, 26 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Journal of My Life

Hi, I'm Onel5969. DeRossitt, thanks for creating Journal of My Life!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. Nice job, but a little too heavy on the quotations. Articles should mainly consist of prose, with quotations used to augment that prose. This article consists mostly of quotes, with prose in support of those quotes.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

Onel5969 ^{TT me} 16:49, 4 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Journal of My Life book cover.jpg

Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for calculation the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. RonBot (talk) 17:11, 5 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, DeRossitt. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, DeRossitt. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Cover of Philippe Sollers' Paradis.jpg

Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for the calculation of the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. See User:RonBot for info on how to not get these messages. RonBot (talk) 18:06, 25 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File:Philippe sollers H cover.jpg

Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for the calculation of the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. See User:RonBot for info on how to not get these messages. RonBot (talk) 17:01, 2 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Call-out culture

The article Call-out culture has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

not notable. Sources seem to be almost entirely op-eds, it could be covered in a broader article on social media or something similar

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Bacondrum (talk) 22:26, 12 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Assume good faith

Please do not attack other editors, as you did at Call-out culture. Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you. Bacondrum (talk) 02:13, 13 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Issuing level 1 warning about removing AfD template from articles before the discussion is complete. (Peachy 2.0 (alpha 8))

Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles, or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion debates, as you did with Phillip Stackhouse. Otherwise, it may be difficult to create consensus. If you oppose the deletion of an article, please comment at the respective page instead. This is an automated message from a bot about this edit, where you removed the deletion template from an article before the deletion discussion was complete. If this message is in error, please report it.—^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 22:11, 3 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Administrative Notice Board Incident Report

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Bacondrum (talk) 04:19, 4 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion declined: Phillip Stackhouse

Hello DeRossitt. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Phillip Stackhouse, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: notability is unlikely but not impossible based on the myriad of news articles mentioning him. Let the AFD handle it. Thank you. So Why 10:06, 4 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from personal attacks

Please do not attack other editors, as you did at Call-out culture. Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you. Bacondrum (talk) 08:34, 15 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Got it. DeRossitt (talk) 04:50, 22 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion discussion about Andrea Long Chu

Hello, DeRossitt,

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username MurielMary and it's nice to meet you :-)

I wanted to let you know that I've started a discussion about whether an article that you created, Andrea Long Chu should be deleted. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Andrea Long Chu .

You might like to note that such discussions usually run for seven days and are not ballot-polls. And, our guide about effectively contributing to such discussions is worth a read. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|MurielMary}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

MurielMary (talk) 11:25, 17 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Before Novels

Hello, DeRossitt,

Thank you for creating Before Novels.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

Keep up the great work starting articles about various notable books, but an article's content shouldn't be 80% quotes

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Rosguill}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

_signed,Rosguill ^talk 06:29, 16 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Autopatrolled granted

Hi DeRossitt, I just wanted to let you know that I have added the "autopatrolled" permission to your account, as you have created numerous, valid articles. This feature will have no effect on your editing, and is simply intended to reduce the workload on new page patrollers. For more information on the autopatrolled right, see Wikipedia:Autopatrolled. Feel free to leave me a message if you have any questions. Happy editing! Beeblebrox (talk) 20:15, 16 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Would appreciate your input here, thanks!

This message is being sent to let you know of a discussion at the Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard regarding edit war. Content disputes can hold up article development and make editing difficult for editors. You are not required to participate, but you are both invited and encouraged to help this dispute come to a resolution. The thread is "Call-out culture".The discussion is about the topic Call-out culture. Please join us to help form a consensus. Thank you! - Sridc (talk) 23:59, 7 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Invitation to edit call-out culture

Hi again, I had the opportunity to read the talk page archive of Call-out culture and noticed your comments in it. It appears to me that at some point you got discouraged from contributing to the article. I understand that there were behaviour roadblocks–something I myself faced when editing this article–however now we have a mediator who is willing to oversee content disputes, which gives me hope that this article will only continue to grow to be better than it ever was. I produced my plan here about how to go about improving the article, and have also been leaving a trail of ideas for new content at the end of Talk:Call-out_culture to use as soon as (about a week from now) the article is taken out of being edit-protected. I'd like to invite you to participate in the Talk page of this article in the coming weeks, and would greatly appreciate your input (be it to provide consensus, or new ideas). Thank you! —Srid^YO 20:38, 9 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@DeRossitt: I appreciate the references. I had read the Talk page archive, not the ANI discussion, which I just did. My impression too is that Bacondrum is extremely biased towards to either deleting this article or keeping it very basic.

But the real problem, as far as I can understand, is that the active editors of Call-out culture lack diversity of viewpoints. Bacondrum, and two other editors, seem to be either actively reluctant to improving the article (esp. mentioning the dominant viewpoints) or, at best, totally ignorant of this topic. While I was making my first edits in this article, I was the only person who was both actively interested in its improvement and aware of the dominant group of viewpoints (most of which got reverted by Bacondrum early this year.)

I'm just curious though, how did Bacondrum get away with retaining their deletion changes despite majority of editors not giving consensus? Did you folks not take it dispute resolution?

In any case, I would not wish to repeat history here. Which is why I invited you to collaborate with me on editing Call-out culture (as soon as it comes out of protected-edit in about 5 days). I need the support of fellow editors to improve this article. And I don't like how Bacondrum is the only editor who is mostly engaging with me on the Talk page. I've been adding all the sources I can find in Talk:Call-out_culture, and I'd appreciate consensus response from other editors. If Bacondrum is the only person objecting, and 3 other editors say otherwise, it would be much easier to make a decision. —Srid^YO 19:37, 10 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speaking only for myself, I am not interested enough in the Callout Culture article to devote time to fighting it out over edits. I’d rather be working on topics I’m really interested in. However, I thought the pre-Bacondrum article was far better than what it became after Bacondrum’s edits. And I found Bacondrum’s habits to be incredibly grating — giving the impression of barking orders at people along the lines of “we’ve got to whip this article into shape,” completely ignoring WP:NORUSH. This is someone who gave the impression of trying to WP:OWN the article and essentially holding the article hostage with an inexhaustible willingness to outlast anyone in an edit war (resulting, as you know, in multiple bans for violating 3RR). And so much of the discussion was over silliness like whether Bromwich was off limits for citation because he had previously written on fashion. It was just a very unrewarding process because we were arguing with someone who seemed incapable of discerning nuance or understanding Wikipedia policy, so the discussions would get nowhere. So I appreciate your kind encouragement to edit the article but my sole involvement has been to object to Bacondrum’s abusive and alienating editing which continues to evade Wikipedia governance. Bacondrum will surely consider that a “personal attack” but the truth isn’t an attack, it’s just the truth—and the multiple, increasingly lengthy bans Bacondrum has received show that administrators agree with me that Bacondrum’s conduct has been abusive, and I don’t think one can be faulted for stating the obvious. DeRossitt (talk)

Thanks for your note! So, I opened yet another ANI incident on Bacondrum, because just in the last two days they tried to accuse me of acting in bad faith multiple times (presumably to discourage me from contributing?). See Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/Incidents#Bacondrum's_non-stop_bad-faith_accusations. I included the past two ANI's for context. Did I miss something? —Srid^YO 01:03, 11 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello again. I know you are not interested enough in the article to devote time to "fighting it out over edits" (I certainly can see how time-consuming and frustrating it can be!), BUT ... with a neutral mediator in place (who I'm sure will certainly nip any Bacondrum-related blockage in the bud), would you at least be interested in contributing to consensus based discussions in the Talk page? The mediator is user: Robert McClenon and he recently wrote "Also, if anyone has a suggestion for a way to involve more editors by neutrally inviting more editors via a WikiProject, that may help." and I thought of you. —Srid^YO 01:38, 11 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ANI where I mentioned you

Hi, I mentioned you There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is Compromise. I mentioned you in relation to another editor's question. 13:59, 12 November 2019 (UTC)

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:04, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:17, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Blockquotes in article on Erin Markey

Hi there. I was just working on the article Erin Markey you created back in 2016. Thanks for this great addition! I noticed there are a lot of blockquotes that could be improved. I was going to attempt to pull out the essential pieces from the blockquotes and incorporate them into paragraph form with related information, but I wanted to check with you first to see if you'd like to handle this. Let me know, and thanks again! Shoestringnomad (talk) 05:18, 27 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, thanks for the note. I don’t have time to do any editing on the Markey article so please don’t hesitate to do whatever you think necessary to improve it. - DeRossitt (talk) 20:52, 27 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Noted! Thanks for letting me know. Shoestringnomad (talk) 21:49, 27 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:05, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]