Talk:Sabbath Bloody Sabbath

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Sabbath Bloody Sabbath article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Albums

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Albums, an attempt at building a useful resource on recordings from a variety of genres. If you would like to participate, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.AlbumsWikipedia:WikiProject AlbumsTemplate:WikiProject AlbumsAlbum articles

Metal

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Metal, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of heavy metal music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MetalWikipedia:WikiProject MetalTemplate:WikiProject MetalHeavy Metal articles

<^>v|This album is connected|v<^>

All song titles serve as redirects to this album or have been placed at the appropriate disambiguation pages.--Hraefen ^Talk 17:46, 11 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Progressive Rock

This album definitely stands out as Sabbath's progressive record and should be added to the genre box. Iommi himself has said this wasn't a "rock album".

Problem is it has no prog rock elements that swerve it far enough from heavy metal to make it anything more than just another Black Sabbath heavy metal album.. no different then any other Black Sabbath heavy metal album. Tony Iommi could've said he felt it was a country album... Lemmy says Motorhead isn't a heavy metal band... Robert Plant says Led Zeppelin aren't a heavy metal band either... but that's certainly what both of them are regardless of what the artist says. On Wikipedia it's all about cites from reliable sources. Libs 03:27, 31 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

My apologies, anything to further the light. All hail wikipedia. Revan ltrl (talk) 16:14, 8 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Excuse me, this is totally offtopic but Led Zeppelin IS NOT heavy metal, not in the slightest way, even. KirillM (talk) 14:30, 9 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I agree about Led Zeppelin. Not metal in any way. You also fail to see (apart from your misspellings) that the guitarist himself is the best, most reliable source we'll ever find on this matter, and not, say, allmusicguide, which lowers this site to second-hand source-status. I think it's perfectly fine to cite it as progressive metal.Revan ltrl (talk) 00:41, 30 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Iommi said that it wasn't a rock album. Progressive rock is a subgenre of rock, so if we go by what he said, we won't be able to describe it as progressive rock. And please don't make childish remarks when you don't get your way. That's well... childish. --John of Lancaster (talk) 17:47, 8 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

How exactly is this not a rock album? Even if it's not heavy metal, it's still rock. It sounds like rock, and uses all the elements of rock. Tony Iommi is mistakened. TheEarthboundFan2001 (talk) 03:59, 27 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

AC/DC covering Black Sabbath?

I took the liberty of taking the part where it says AC/DC covered Killing Yourself to Live since this is very unlikely. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.118.213.147 (talk) 01:59, 28 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

According to this reference they did cover it. J04n(talk page) 02:05, 28 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I sincerely doubt that AC/DC would cover Killing Yourself to Live, or did for that matter. As a matter of fact, that seems to me like a pretty unreliable source. The only thing AC/DC had to do with Black Sabbath was that they toured with them for a few dates during the Technical Ecstacy tour. I will believe this foolish statement if I actually hear audio of AC/DC doing it. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.118.213.147 (talk) 20:01, 28 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I request someone looks into this with a credible source. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.118.213.147 (talk) 02:26, 29 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

there is a dead link that is supposed to show the back of the albums gatefold. I cant hepl more because i am injured at the moment. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.40.92.5 (talk) 22:11, 9 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I am changing the dead link of the artwork of the back of the albums gatefold to a working one. 95.45.113.179 (talk) 19:33, 27 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Doom

I removed doom metal because this album isn't any "doomier" than other black sabbath records 5.169.76.165 (talk) 23:37, 10 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Sabbath Bloody Sabbath. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/20120427215415/http://www.rollingstone.com:80/music/artists/black-sabbath/albumguide to http://www.rollingstone.com/music/artists/black-sabbath/albumguide

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers. —^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 18:29, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Sabbath Bloody Sabbath. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive http://www.webcitation.org/68cr1so7P?url=http://www.riaa.com/goldandplatinumdata.php?resultpage=1 to http://www.riaa.com/goldandplatinumdata.php?resultpage=1&table=SEARCH_RESULTS&action=&title=SABBATH%2C%20BLOODY%20SABBATH&artist=Black%20Sabbath&format=&debutLP=&category=&sex=&releaseDate=&requestNo=&type=&level=&label=&company=&certificationDate=&awardDescription=&catalogNo=&aSex=&rec_id=&charField=&gold=&platinum=&multiPlat=&level2=&certDate=&album=&id=&after=&before=&startMonth=1&endMonth=1&startYear=1958&endYear=2009&sort=Artist&perPage=25

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:19, 4 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Sabbath Bloody Sabbath. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:14, 12 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nose flute?

It's mentioned by Jeff Wagner on page 12 of his 2010 book Mean Deviation: Four Decades of Progressive Heavy Metal here. But it's hardly conclusive. Martinevans123 (talk) 14:53, 21 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]