User talk:Korodzik

Hi, welcome to Wikipedia! Glad to have you around, and thanks for your edits to DOOM. If you have any questions, you should check out Wikipedia:FAQ or try the Wikipedia:Tutorial. Or you can ask at Wikipedia:Help desk. Glad to have you, and I hope to see you around. Meelar 17:43, 16 May 2004 (UTC)[reply]

The Hunting of the Snark - revealed

Hi, I saw your last post on the Talk:The Hunting of the Snark page, I uploaded an image which should help clear up all the insanity over the "interpretations". Carrol never divulged enough information regarding the Boojum, however I believe Henry Holiday added an easter egg by hiding his interpretation of the Boojum along with the fate of the Bake in his last illustrated lanel - see for yourself. Piecraft 11:19, 24 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Wydawnictwo MON

A tag has been placed on Wydawnictwo MON requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a company or corporation, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for companies and corporations.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Vianello (talk) 06:52, 20 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Gog.com

I have nominated Gog.com, an article you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gog.com. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. SchuminWeb (Talk) 04:22, 15 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You maybe interested in the Article Rescue Squadron

Hello, Korodzik. Based on the templates on your talk page, I would like you to consider joining the Article Rescue Squadron. Rescue Squadron members are focused on rescuing articles for deletion, that might otherwise be lost forever. I think you will find our project matches your vision of Wikipedia. Note:Keep in mind that Squadron members officially state they are not inclusionists. ~~~~

AfD nomination of Jones in the Fast Lane

An article that you have been involved in editing, Jones in the Fast Lane, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jones in the Fast Lane. Thank you.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Rogerb67 (talk) 23:18, 13 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your edit to Jones in the Fast Lane

I note you added a reference. Could you give an indication of the depth of coverage of the reference? It's hard to tell from where you've cited. A scan of the article would be ideal, otherwise whatever you can provide. Many thanks, --Rogerb67 (talk) 23:07, 15 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

New messages!

Hello, Korodzik. You have new messages at WP:Requests for feedback.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

The exact location of the thread is here. Thank you. Chevy monte carlo 05:24, 11 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template

I saw that It's only two extra letters :-) –MuZemike 15:52, 7 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:16, 30 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Top Secret (magazine)

The article Top Secret (magazine) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Completely unsourced article. Searches did not turn up anything on any of the search engines. There were some hits on Books, but they appear to be about other magazines with this same name.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 12:48, 23 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Top Secret (magazine) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Top Secret (magazine) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Top Secret (magazine) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 21:50, 27 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Frye Computer Systems

The article Frye Computer Systems has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

At best, should be merged into Seagate, but it isn't clear that this is even a footnote in their history.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. FalconK (talk) 01:48, 3 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:NCSA Mosaic.PNG

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:NCSA Mosaic.PNG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:53, 1 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]