Talk:Irish Ferries

This article was nominated for deletion on 18 September 2018. The result of the discussion was keep.

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Irish Maritime, a collaborative effort to improve and standardise the content and structure of maritime, seafaring and inland waterways articles associated with the island of Ireland. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks.Irish MaritimeWikipedia:WikiProject Irish MaritimeTemplate:WikiProject Irish MaritimeIrish Maritime articles

Ships

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ships, a project to improve all Ship-related articles. If you would like to help improve this and other articles, please join the project, or contribute to the project discussion. All interested editors are welcome. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.ShipsWikipedia:WikiProject ShipsTemplate:WikiProject ShipsShips articles

Ireland Mid‑importance

	Ireland portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ireland, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Ireland on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IrelandWikipedia:WikiProject IrelandTemplate:WikiProject IrelandIreland articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Untitled

Wondering whether this page should be moved to "Irish Ferries" - the name by which the vast majority of people know this company???

I Don't know about moving it but I just added a redirect page from "Irish Ferries", that should suffice.

This hardly seems to be written with a neutral POV. Why the need for the bold capitals, and opinion?

Removed the bold capitals. - Kjet 11:33, 30 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Irishferries.png

Image:Irishferries.png is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 07:41, 5 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Filipino

Despite the trend to allow the dictates of Tagalog to influence English when speaking/writing about citizens of the Philippines, English does not differentiate gender by altering word stems. Thus, contrary to the tide of popularity, “Filipina” technically doesn’t exist in English. She is a “Filipino” or a “Filipino woman.” We don’t differentiate between genders when referring to other nationalities – so why this tendency to do so with Filipinos? I suggest that we stick to English (inclusive of English rules and grammar) .

The writer who created , “a Filipina woman,” has muddied the waters even more. Is this to differentiate from a Filipina man?

Flag

I've just returned from a trip on M/S Normandy, and it was flying the Bahamian flag. Millbanks 22:39, 8 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Ship prefix consistancy

Some kind of a common decision should probably be made on which version of the interchangable ship prefixes (MS/MV/MF) should be used on the article (if any). I have personally used M/S because it is the commonly used variant where I come from, but I realise this is not the commonly used variant everywhere. At the moment it can be very confusing when some parts of the article use MV and other M/S. We should choose a single one and stick to it, for the sake of clarity and consistancy. -- Kjet 14:26, 3 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Cypriot company?

Why doesn't this article lead with "Irish Ferries is a Cypriot company" considering the result of the infamous Irish Ferries dispute in 2005? (Sources: "The company also made clear that it wished to ditch the Irish flag under which it operates and work under the flag of Cyprus" (Steven Morris, All at Sea (The Guardian, 1 December 2005); "The pride of the Irish merchant marine now flies the Cypriot flag." (Ulysses, Irish Ferries website); "During the January 2006 refits, the Ulysses Jonathan Swift, and Isle of Innismore were re-registered in Lisammol, Cyprus" (Irish Ferries enthusiasts). 188.141.10.11 (talk) 18:55, 12 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

2005 Dispute

I just noticed that, extraordinarily, this article has not a single mention of the internationally infamous Irish Ferries dispute between September 2005 and December 2005, which brought up to 100,000 people onto Irish streets in protest at Irish Ferries decision to sack all 543 Irish employees and hire much cheaper eastern European workers. This (1 December 2005) and this on the resolution (20 December 2005) provide good summaries of this dispute. And here's a New York Times article on it ('Ferry Dispute Tests Ireland's Tolerance for Globalization', 27 December 2005). 188.141.10.11 (talk) 19:05, 12 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Irish Ferries. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100312103514/http://www.irish-ferries-enthusiasts.com/irishferrieshsitory.php to http://www.irish-ferries-enthusiasts.com/irishferrieshsitory.php

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:50, 16 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]